71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
75/100
3 professional tests
User signal (40%)
65/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 vs Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
64/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better wet and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 if handling matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HP4 716 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Kinergy Eco 2 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 60 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Kinergy Eco 2 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 60 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 72 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HP4 716 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 70 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HP4 716 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy Eco 2 | Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 70 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 | Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 67 |
| Dry | 78 | 80 |
| Wet | 77 | 60 |
| Comfort | 64 | 60 |
| Noise | 72 | – |
| Treadwear | 68 | 70 |
| Handling | 65 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
67
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, value-oriented tire that offers competent dry-weather performance and respectable longevity for daily commuting. While many users appreciate its affordability and fuel efficiency, the consensus is polarized regarding its noise levels and wet-weather confidence, with several reports of premature road noise and inconsistent grip in adverse conditions.
Pros
- Excellent value for money
- Good dry-weather traction and handling
- High fuel efficiency due to low rolling resistance
- Impressive tread life and durability for many users
Cons
- High levels of road noise
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip and braking performance
- Stiff ride quality and lack of comfort
- Potential for premature dry rot or accelerated wear in specific conditions
Observations
- Users transitioning from larger wheels (17-inch) to smaller diameters (15-inch) reported a significant reduction in road noise.
- Drivers of light city vehicles reported better-than-average tread longevity compared to heavier or more powerful vehicle applications.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 | B · Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Hankook
67
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better wet and comfort. Pick the Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 if handling matters most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 77 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 scores 70 vs 65 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 64 vs 60 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta HP4 716
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 also compared with
Kumho Ecsta HP4 716 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.