Tests – · none yet Owners 29 · 2 reviews
Hankook Kinergy PT vs Falken ZIEX CT50 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison64Why this score
Source Kinergy PT ZIEX CT50 Reviews found online – 61 -
–
Wet
No comparison60Why this score
Source Kinergy PT ZIEX CT50 Reviews found online – 57 -
–
Comfort
No comparison61Why this score
Source Kinergy PT ZIEX CT50 Reviews found online – 52 -
–
Treadwear
No comparison60Why this score
Source Kinergy PT ZIEX CT50 Reviews found online – 56 -
–
Handling
No comparison59Why this score
Source Kinergy PT ZIEX CT50 Reviews found online – 59
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy PT | Falken ZIEX CT50 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 61 |
| Dry | – | 64 |
| Wet | – | 60 |
| Comfort | – | 61 |
| Treadwear | – | 60 |
| Handling | – | 59 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Kinergy PT
ZIEX CT50
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy PT | B · Falken ZIEX CT50 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Kinergy PT
Falken ZIEX CT50
Only Falken ZIEX CT50 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.