Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Kinergy PT vs Yokohama AVID TOURING-S — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Kinergy PT

All Season Premium Touring tires

Hankook Kinergy PT tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
94/100
281 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
93
Snow
10
Comfort
93
Noise
91
Treadwear
92
Handling
94

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Yokohama AVID TOURING-S tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
Owner ratings
Dry
82
Wet
75
Snow
61
Comfort
81
Noise
79
Treadwear
77
Handling
81

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Kinergy PT — better wet, treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama AVID TOURING-S if snow matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Kinergy PT leads by 13
A — Hankook Kinergy PT
95
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
82
Why this score
SourceKinergy PTAVID TOURING-S
Tire Rack owners – 83
Tyre Reviews owners 50 –
SimpleTire owners – 95

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Kinergy PT leads by 18
A — Hankook Kinergy PT
93
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
75
Why this score
SourceKinergy PTAVID TOURING-S
Tire Rack owners – 77
Tyre Reviews owners 50 –
SimpleTire owners – 90

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) AVID TOURING-S leads by 51
A — Hankook Kinergy PT
10
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
61
Why this score
SourceKinergy PTAVID TOURING-S
Tire Rack owners – 62
Tyre Reviews owners 10 –
SimpleTire owners – 87

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Kinergy PT leads by 12
A — Hankook Kinergy PT
93
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
81
Why this score
SourceKinergy PTAVID TOURING-S
Tire Rack owners – 82
Tyre Reviews owners 40 –
SimpleTire owners – 94

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Kinergy PT leads by 12
A — Hankook Kinergy PT
91
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
79
Why this score
SourceKinergy PTAVID TOURING-S
SimpleTire owners – 90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Kinergy PT leads by 15
A — Hankook Kinergy PT
92
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
77
Why this score
SourceKinergy PTAVID TOURING-S
Tire Rack owners – 78
Tyre Reviews owners 10 –
SimpleTire owners – 92

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Kinergy PT leads by 13
A — Hankook Kinergy PT
94
B — Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
81

Scores at a glance

Hankook Kinergy PT vs Yokohama AVID TOURING-S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Kinergy PTYokohama AVID TOURING-S
Relative Score 83 76
Dry 95 82
Wet 93 75
Snow 10 61
Comfort 93 81
Noise 91 79
Treadwear 92 77
Handling 94 81

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Kinergy PT

The Hankook Kinergy PT is widely regarded as a high-value, long-lasting all-season tire that offers a quiet and comfortable ride. While most users praise its wet and dry traction, opinions on its winter performance are polarized, and a small subset of users report premature wear or noise issues.

Pros

  • Excellent tread life and high mileage warranty
  • Quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands like Michelin
  • Reliable wet and dry pavement traction

Cons

  • Inconsistent performance in deep snow or icy conditions
  • Occasional reports of premature tread wear
  • Some users report increased road noise over time
  • Frustrating rebate fulfillment processes

Observations

  • EV owners appreciate the tire's efficiency and quiet operation as a cost-effective alternative to OEM tires.
  • SUV and crossover drivers generally report high satisfaction with the tire's stability and ride comfort.
  • Some users suggest the tire's stiffer compound is better suited for larger vehicles than smaller, lighter passenger cars.
Tire B Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Kinergy PT B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S
CategoryAll Season Premium Touring tires—
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available—28
Rim diameters—15″ – 17″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—620 A B
Treadwear warranty—80,000 mi
Sidewall—Whitewall
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Yokohama

Winner: Hankook Kinergy PT — better wet, treadwear and dry. Pick the Yokohama AVID TOURING-S if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Yokohama AVID TOURING-S scores 61 vs 10 on snow.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy PT scores 93 vs 75 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Kinergy PT scores 92 vs 77 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy PT scores 95 vs 82 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Kinergy PT
Tire B · Yokohama AVID TOURING-S

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.