83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
94/100
281 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Kinergy PT vs Yokohama AVID Ascend — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
89
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
23 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better snow. Pick the Hankook Kinergy PT if handling, comfort and noise matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 80 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 80 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
AVID Ascend leads by 75
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 10 | 80 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 40 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 3
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 10 | 95 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Kinergy PT | AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Kinergy PT | Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 89 |
| Dry | 95 | 95 |
| Wet | 93 | 93 |
| Snow | 10 | 85 |
| Comfort | 93 | 89 |
| Noise | 91 | 88 |
| Treadwear | 92 | 90 |
| Handling | 94 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
89
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Kinergy PT is widely regarded as a high-value, long-lasting all-season tire that offers a quiet and comfortable ride. While most users praise its wet and dry traction, opinions on its winter performance are polarized, and a small subset of users report premature wear or noise issues.
Pros
- Excellent tread life and high mileage warranty
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Reliable wet and dry pavement traction
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in deep snow or icy conditions
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear
- Some users report increased road noise over time
- Frustrating rebate fulfillment processes
Observations
- EV owners appreciate the tire's efficiency and quiet operation as a cost-effective alternative to OEM tires.
- SUV and crossover drivers generally report high satisfaction with the tire's stability and ride comfort.
- Some users suggest the tire's stiffer compound is better suited for larger vehicles than smaller, lighter passenger cars.
The Yokohama Avid Ascend is widely regarded as a high-value, all-season tire that excels in wet weather performance and ride comfort. While most users report significant improvements in traction and noise levels compared to factory-installed tires, a small subset of owners has raised concerns regarding premature tread wear and occasional manufacturing defects.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather traction and hydroplaning resistance
- High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium competitors
- Smooth and quiet ride quality
- Reliable handling in light snow and slushy conditions
Cons
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear in some instances
- Occasional noise issues on dry pavement
- Isolated reports of tires going out of round after moderate mileage
Observations
- Subaru Forester owners frequently cite these as a superior upgrade for both comfort and all-weather capability.
- Users of AWD vehicles, including the Audi A4 and Toyota Sienna, report high satisfaction with the tire's handling in mixed precipitation.
- Hybrid vehicle owners noted that the tire maintains fuel efficiency comparable to factory specifications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Kinergy PT | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Premium Touring All Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 740 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 75,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Hankook
89
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Yokohama AVID Ascend — better snow. Pick the Hankook Kinergy PT if handling, comfort and noise matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Yokohama AVID Ascend scores 85 vs 10 on snow.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Kinergy PT scores 94 vs 80 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Kinergy PT scores 93 vs 89 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Kinergy PT scores 91 vs 88 on noise.
Tire A · Hankook Kinergy PT
Tire B · Yokohama AVID Ascend
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Kinergy PT also compared with
Yokohama AVID Ascend also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.