61
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Hankook Kinergy PT — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
94/100
281 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Kinergy PT — better comfort, handling and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Kinergy PT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 50 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 26
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Kinergy PT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 50 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Advantage T/A leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Kinergy PT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | 10 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 43
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Kinergy PT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 40 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Kinergy PT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 10 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Kinergy PT leads by 37
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | Kinergy PT |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Hankook Kinergy PT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 82 |
| Dry | 80 | 95 |
| Wet | 67 | 93 |
| Snow | 20 | 10 |
| Comfort | 50 | 93 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 92 |
| Handling | 57 | 94 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Observations
- The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
The Hankook Kinergy PT is widely regarded as a high-value, long-lasting all-season tire that offers a quiet and comfortable ride. While most users praise its wet and dry traction, opinions on its winter performance are polarized, and a small subset of users report premature wear or noise issues.
Pros
- Excellent tread life and high mileage warranty
- Quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands like Michelin
- Reliable wet and dry pavement traction
Cons
- Inconsistent performance in deep snow or icy conditions
- Occasional reports of premature tread wear
- Some users report increased road noise over time
- Frustrating rebate fulfillment processes
Observations
- EV owners appreciate the tire's efficiency and quiet operation as a cost-effective alternative to OEM tires.
- SUV and crossover drivers generally report high satisfaction with the tire's stability and ride comfort.
- Some users suggest the tire's stiffer compound is better suited for larger vehicles than smaller, lighter passenger cars.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Hankook Kinergy PT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
BFGoodrich
82
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Kinergy PT — better comfort, handling and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Kinergy PT scores 93 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Kinergy PT scores 94 vs 57 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Kinergy PT scores 93 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Kinergy PT scores 92 vs 75 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy PT
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A also compared with
Hankook Kinergy PT also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.