60
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
61/100
1 owner review
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Bridgestone Turanza ER70 vs Hankook Optimo H426 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
56/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Optimo H426 — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza ER70 if comfort, handling and dry matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Turanza ER70 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Optimo H426 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 51 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 76 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 25 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 20 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Turanza ER70 leads by 22
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 56 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 58 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Optimo H426 leads by 49
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 47 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 10 | 60 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Turanza ER70 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Turanza ER70 | Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 63 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER70 | Hankook Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 67 |
| Dry | 90 | 80 |
| Wet | 70 | 74 |
| Snow | – | 21 |
| Comfort | 80 | 58 |
| Treadwear | 10 | 59 |
| Handling | 80 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
60
/ 100
Tire A
67
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Turanza ER70 receives a mixed reception, primarily due to significant concerns regarding premature tread wear. While the user has a history of brand loyalty to Bridgestone, the specific experience with this tire indicates a notable failure in longevity.
Cons
- Extremely short tread life
- Potential quality control inconsistencies
Observations
- The reported mileage of 7,800 miles suggests the tire may not meet expected durability standards for standard passenger vehicle usage.
The Hankook Optimo H426 presents a polarizing experience, often serving as an OEM tire that provides competent dry and wet traction for daily commuting. While some users appreciate its initial comfort and handling capabilities, the consensus is heavily impacted by concerns regarding premature tread wear and inconsistent noise levels over the life of the tire.
Pros
- Reliable grip and handling on dry pavement
- Confident performance in wet weather conditions
- Initial comfort and quietness when new
Cons
- Short tread life and premature wear
- Increased road noise as the tire ages
- High price point relative to performance value
- Uneven wear patterns across front and rear axles
Observations
- Users reported significantly faster wear on front-wheel-drive vehicles, leading to uneven tread depletion compared to rear tires.
- Drivers of compact sedans noted that while the tire offers decent handling, it fails to maintain its initial noise-dampening qualities over time.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER70 | B · Hankook Optimo H426 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
60
/ 100
Bridgestone
67
/ 100
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Optimo H426 — better treadwear and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Turanza ER70 if comfort, handling and dry matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Optimo H426 scores 59 vs 10 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Turanza ER70 scores 80 vs 58 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Turanza ER70 scores 80 vs 63 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Turanza ER70 scores 90 vs 80 on dry.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER70
Tire B · Hankook Optimo H426
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Turanza ER70 also compared with
Hankook Optimo H426 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.