Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Optimo H428 vs Yokohama BluEarth S34 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Hankook Optimo H428 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
19/100
Owner ratings
Dry
62
Wet
47
Snow
19
Comfort
61
Noise
62
Treadwear
60
Handling
62

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama BluEarth S34

All Season Premium Touring tires

Yokohama BluEarth S34 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
34/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
73
Wet
46
Snow
20
Comfort
50
Noise
–
Treadwear
62
Handling
43

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Optimo H428 — better handling and comfort. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth S34 if dry matters most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth S34 leads by 11
A — Hankook Optimo H428
62
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
73
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428BluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 63 80
Tyre Reviews owners – 70

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Optimo H428 leads by 1
A — Hankook Optimo H428
47
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
46
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428BluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 49 63
Tyre Reviews owners – 40

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) BluEarth S34 leads by 1
A — Hankook Optimo H428
19
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
20
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428BluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 19 49
Tyre Reviews owners – 10

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Optimo H428 leads by 11
A — Hankook Optimo H428
61
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
50
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428BluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 62 58
Tyre Reviews owners – 47

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Optimo H428
62
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) BluEarth S34 leads by 2
A — Hankook Optimo H428
60
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
62
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428BluEarth S34
Tire Rack owners 61 54
Tyre Reviews owners – 65

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Optimo H428 leads by 19
A — Hankook Optimo H428
62
B — Yokohama BluEarth S34
43
Why this score
SourceOptimo H428BluEarth S34
Tyre Reviews owners – 43

Scores at a glance

Hankook Optimo H428 vs Yokohama BluEarth S34: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Optimo H428Yokohama BluEarth S34
Relative Score 52 50
Dry 62 73
Wet 47 46
Snow 19 20
Comfort 61 50
Noise 62 –
Treadwear 60 62
Handling 62 43

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Optimo H428

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Yokohama BluEarth S34

The Yokohama BluEarth S34 is generally viewed as an underwhelming OEM tire that prioritizes low rolling resistance over performance. While dry traction is considered adequate for daily commuting, users frequently report concerns regarding wet weather grip and excessive road noise.

Pros

  • Acceptable dry traction for standard commuting
  • Low rolling resistance design

Cons

  • Poor wet weather performance and traction
  • High levels of road noise
  • Mediocre handling characteristics

Observations

  • Commonly identified as an OEM fitment for the Toyota Prius, where users note that the tire's hard compound may contribute to handling deficiencies.
  • Users suggest that the tire's focus on efficiency may be the primary cause for the observed lack of grip in wet conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Optimo H428 B · Yokohama BluEarth S34
Category—All Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth9.5/32″—
UTQG500 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Yokohama

Winner: Hankook Optimo H428 — better handling and comfort. Pick the Yokohama BluEarth S34 if dry matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Optimo H428 scores 62 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Optimo H428 scores 61 vs 50 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth S34 scores 73 vs 62 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Optimo H428
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth S34

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.