69
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
63/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Michelin Primacy MXM4 vs Yokohama BluEarth S34 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
50
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
34/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Primacy MXM4 — better snow, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Primacy MXM4 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 70 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Primacy MXM4 leads by 24
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 63 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 68 | 40 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Primacy MXM4 leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 60 | 49 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 10 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Primacy MXM4 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | 58 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 47 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Primacy MXM4 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 73 | 54 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 65 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Primacy MXM4 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Primacy MXM4 | BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 43 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Primacy MXM4 | Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 50 |
| Dry | 77 | 73 |
| Wet | 70 | 46 |
| Snow | 51 | 20 |
| Comfort | 66 | 50 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 62 |
| Handling | 64 | 43 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
69
/ 100
Tire A
50
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Primacy MXM4 is generally regarded as a comfort-oriented grand touring tire that excels in ride quality and tread longevity but falls short for performance-minded drivers. While users praise its ability to dampen road vibrations and maintain durability, many report lackluster handling, significant understeer, and underwhelming wet-weather traction when pushed.
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
- Strong tread life and durability
- High fuel efficiency
- Effective resistance to aquaplaning in heavy rain
Cons
- Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
- Noticeable understeer when cornering
- Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
- Increased road noise on certain surfaces
Observations
- Drivers of high-torque FWD vehicles report significant wheelspin and traction issues in wet conditions.
- Tesla Model 3 owners noted a decline in handling performance compared to dedicated summer tires, suggesting the tire is better suited for comfort than spirited driving.
- The tire's run-flat variants are noted for maintaining a surprisingly soft and compliant ride despite their reinforced construction.
The Yokohama BluEarth S34 is generally viewed as an underwhelming OEM tire that prioritizes low rolling resistance over performance. While dry traction is considered adequate for daily commuting, users frequently report concerns regarding wet weather grip and excessive road noise.
Pros
- Acceptable dry traction for standard commuting
- Low rolling resistance design
Cons
- Poor wet weather performance and traction
- High levels of road noise
- Mediocre handling characteristics
Observations
- Commonly identified as an OEM fitment for the Toyota Prius, where users note that the tire's hard compound may contribute to handling deficiencies.
- Users suggest that the tire's focus on efficiency may be the primary cause for the observed lack of grip in wet conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Primacy MXM4 | B · Yokohama BluEarth S34 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
69
/ 100
Michelin
50
/ 100
Yokohama
Winner: Michelin Primacy MXM4 — better snow, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 51 vs 20 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 70 vs 46 on wet.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 64 vs 43 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Primacy MXM4 scores 79 vs 62 on treadwear.
Tire A · Michelin Primacy MXM4
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth S34
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Primacy MXM4 also compared with
Yokohama BluEarth S34 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.