74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
9 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Optimo K406 vs Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
21 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Optimo K406 — better wet and dry. Pick the Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Optimo K406 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Optimo K406 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 76 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Optimo K406 leads by 21
Why this score
| Source | Optimo K406 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 62 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Optimo K406 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 80 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Optimo K406 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 66 | 77 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Optimo K406 | Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | 61 |
| DriverReviews owners | – | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Optimo K406 | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 71 |
| Dry | 90 | 76 |
| Wet | 83 | 62 |
| Comfort | 66 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 77 |
| Handling | 61 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
74
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Optimo K406 receives a mixed reception, primarily serving as an original equipment tire that polarizes users based on their expectations of longevity and comfort. While some drivers report impressive mileage and reliable dry-weather handling, others express significant frustration regarding premature tread wear, sidewall durability, and elevated road noise.
Pros
- Reliable dry-weather grip and handling performance
- Competitive value proposition as an entry-level or OE option
- Potential for high mileage in specific, low-stress driving conditions
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life with reports of premature wear
- Noticeable road noise during highway driving
- Susceptibility to sidewall bubbles and structural damage
- Lack of confidence in wet or icy conditions
Observations
- Users driving heavier vehicles noted that the tires are subjected to significant stress, impacting overall longevity.
- Drivers with stiffer suspension setups reported good cornering capabilities but experienced accelerated wear and sidewall issues.
The Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 presents a highly polarized user experience, often described as either an excellent value-oriented eco-tire or a dangerous liability. While many owners praise its fuel efficiency, low noise levels, and comfort for daily commuting, a significant segment of users reports severe concerns regarding wet-weather traction and unpredictable handling during cornering.
Pros
- High fuel efficiency and rolling resistance improvements
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Good ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value for money for casual, non-aggressive driving
Cons
- Unpredictable and poor wet-weather grip
- Tendency to slip or lose traction on roundabouts and corners
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' or unstable handling feel
- High-pitched screeching noise when pushed in dry conditions
Observations
- Users driving smaller hatchbacks like the Honda Jazz or VW Up report significant confidence issues with rear-end stability on roundabouts.
- Drivers on rougher road surfaces, such as those in Kenya, noted that while tread life is impressive, the sidewalls are susceptible to damage from potholes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Optimo K406 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
74
/ 100
Hankook
71
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Hankook Optimo K406 — better wet and dry. Pick the Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 if comfort and treadwear matter most to you.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Optimo K406 scores 83 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Hankook Optimo K406 scores 90 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 80 vs 66 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 77 vs 66 on treadwear.
Tire A · Hankook Optimo K406
Tire B · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Optimo K406 also compared with
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.