Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 6 reviews
Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424 vs Michelin Energy Saver+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Energy Saver+ is ahead, 71–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 65 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
Energy Saver+ +970Why this score
Source OPTIMO ME02 K424 Energy Saver+ Reviews found online 57 71 -
57
Wet
Energy Saver+ +1370Why this score
Source OPTIMO ME02 K424 Energy Saver+ Reviews found online 52 69 -
63
Comfort
Energy Saver+ +871Why this score
Source OPTIMO ME02 K424 Energy Saver+ Reviews found online 57 72 -
62
Treadwear
Energy Saver+ +1173Why this score
Source OPTIMO ME02 K424 Energy Saver+ Reviews found online 60 77 -
57
Handling
Energy Saver+ +1572Why this score
Source OPTIMO ME02 K424 Energy Saver+ Reviews found online 57 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424 | Michelin Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 71 |
| Dry | 61 | 70 |
| Wet | 57 | 70 |
| Comfort | 63 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 73 |
| Handling | 57 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
OPTIMO ME02 K424
Energy Saver+
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A OPTIMO ME02 K424
Pros
- High tread longevity due to a harder rubber compound
- Reported effectiveness in light snowy conditions by select users
Cons
- Extremely poor traction and handling on wet roads
- Increased risk of skidding and loss of control during cornering in rain
- Longer braking distances in wet weather, even with ABS engagement
Tire B Energy Saver+
Pros
- Exceptional treadwear and longevity with many users reporting high mileage (30,000 to 60,000+ miles)
- Impressive fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather traction and slippery behavior during cornering or braking in the rain
- Prone to aquaplaning at higher speeds on wet roads
- Tendency to develop sidewall cracking or dry rot as the tires age
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424 | B · Michelin Energy Saver+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424
Michelin Energy Saver+
Winner: Michelin Energy Saver+ — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 72 vs 57 on handling.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 70 vs 57 on wet.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 73 vs 62 on treadwear.
Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 70 vs 61 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.