Head-to-head Updated

Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424 vs Michelin Energy Saver+ — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

Energy Saver+ is ahead, 71–60

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    Energy Saver+ +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424Energy Saver+
    Reviews found online5771
  2. 57

    Wet

    Energy Saver+ +13
    70
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424Energy Saver+
    Reviews found online5269
  3. 63

    Comfort

    Energy Saver+ +8
    71
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424Energy Saver+
    Reviews found online5772
  4. 62

    Treadwear

    Energy Saver+ +11
    73
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424Energy Saver+
    Reviews found online6077
  5. 57

    Handling

    Energy Saver+ +15
    72
    Why this score
    SourceOPTIMO ME02 K424Energy Saver+
    Reviews found online5772
Scores at a glance
Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424 vs Michelin Energy Saver+: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook OPTIMO ME02 K424Michelin Energy Saver+
Relative Score 60 71
Dry 61 70
Wet 57 70
Comfort 63 71
Treadwear 62 73
Handling 57 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

OPTIMO ME02 K424

Energy Saver+

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A OPTIMO ME02 K424

Pros

  • High tread longevity due to a harder rubber compound
  • Reported effectiveness in light snowy conditions by select users

Cons

  • Extremely poor traction and handling on wet roads
  • Increased risk of skidding and loss of control during cornering in rain
  • Longer braking distances in wet weather, even with ABS engagement
All owner themes in the OPTIMO ME02 K424 review

Tire B Energy Saver+

Pros

  • Exceptional treadwear and longevity with many users reporting high mileage (30,000 to 60,000+ miles)
  • Impressive fuel efficiency and low rolling resistance
  • High level of ride comfort and low road noise

Cons

  • Subpar wet-weather traction and slippery behavior during cornering or braking in the rain
  • Prone to aquaplaning at higher speeds on wet roads
  • Tendency to develop sidewall cracking or dry rot as the tires age
All owner themes in the Energy Saver+ review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424 B · Michelin Energy Saver+
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424

Michelin Energy Saver+

Winner: Michelin Energy Saver+ — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 72 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 70 vs 57 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 73 vs 62 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Energy Saver+ scores 70 vs 61 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook OPTIMO ME02 K424
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver+

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Leads

Energy Saver+

Amazon