67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
42/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 vs Hankook Ventus AS RH07 — Compared
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Hankook
Hankook Ventus AS RH07
66
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
42/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 and Hankook Ventus AS RH07 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 is stronger on noise, comfort and snow. Hankook Ventus AS RH07 is stronger on handling and dry.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ventus AS RH07 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Ventus AS RH07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 76 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ventus AS RH07 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Ventus AS RH07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 76 | 73 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP422 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Ventus AS RH07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 57 | 53 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP422 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Ventus AS RH07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 80 | 62 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Ecopia EP422 leads by 15
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ventus AS RH07 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Ecopia EP422 | Ventus AS RH07 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 70 | 64 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ventus AS RH07 leads by 11
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | Hankook Ventus AS RH07 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 66 |
| Dry | 70 | 76 |
| Wet | 71 | 73 |
| Snow | 61 | 52 |
| Comfort | 72 | 61 |
| Noise | 71 | 56 |
| Treadwear | 62 | 63 |
| Handling | 64 | 75 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
66
/ 100
Tire B
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
Bridgestone
66
/ 100
Hankook
Too close to call: Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 and Hankook Ventus AS RH07 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 is stronger on noise, comfort and snow. Hankook Ventus AS RH07 is stronger on handling and dry.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 scores 71 vs 56 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 scores 72 vs 61 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Ventus AS RH07 scores 75 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 scores 61 vs 52 on snow.
Tire A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422
Tire B · Hankook Ventus AS RH07
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 also compared with
Hankook Ventus AS RH07 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.