Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Ventus R-S4 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Hankook Ventus R-S4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
20 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
72
Comfort
61
Treadwear
86
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Yokohama

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
100 owner reviews
Dry
93
Wet
71
Comfort
77
Treadwear
74
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Hankook Ventus R-S4 and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus R-S4 is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is stronger on comfort and dry.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Neova AD08 leads by 6
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
87
B — Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
93
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Advan Neova AD08
Tire Rack owners 91 –
Tyre Reviews owners 87 94

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus R-S4 leads by 1
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
72
B — Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
71
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Advan Neova AD08
Tire Rack owners 71 –
Tyre Reviews owners 72 72

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Neova AD08 leads by 16
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
61
B — Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
77
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Advan Neova AD08
Tire Rack owners 75 –
Tyre Reviews owners 61 74

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus R-S4 leads by 12
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
86
B — Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
74
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Advan Neova AD08
Tire Rack owners 87 –
Tyre Reviews owners 86 70

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Advan Neova AD08 leads by 2
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
88
B — Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
90
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Advan Neova AD08
Tyre Reviews owners 88 90

Scores at a glance

Hankook Ventus R-S4 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus R-S4Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 79 79
Dry 87 93
Wet 72 71
Comfort 61 77
Treadwear 86 74
Handling 88 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Ventus R-S4

The Hankook Ventus RS4 is widely regarded as the industry benchmark for endurance-focused extreme performance summer tires. While it may not offer the absolute peak grip of specialized autocross tires, it is highly praised for its exceptional tread life, heat consistency, and value, making it a favorite for HPDE participants and endurance racers.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability under heavy track abuse
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to more expensive competitors
  • Consistent dry grip and performance throughout the tire's lifespan
  • Predictable handling and excellent steering feedback
  • Strong heat resistance during long track sessions

Cons

  • Requires significant time and effort to reach optimal operating temperatures
  • Increased road noise and harsh ride quality compared to standard tires
  • Reduced traction in cold or wet conditions
  • Potential fitment issues due to narrow section width relative to nominal size

Observations

  • Lightweight FWD vehicles report excellent handling characteristics and high confidence with this tire.
  • Users note that the tire's sidewall width runs narrow, which may leave rims exposed if sized based on standard tire width expectations.
Tire B Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

The Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 (and its successor, the AD09) is widely regarded as a premier dual-purpose tire that excels in dry-weather performance and steering feedback. While it offers impressive grip and predictability for track days and spirited canyon driving, users note that it requires proper heat management and can become greasy if overdriven or pushed beyond its thermal limits.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and high-speed stability
  • Sharp, communicative steering response and feedback
  • Stiff sidewall construction providing excellent turn-in precision
  • Surprisingly good wet-weather performance for a 200TW tire
  • Better tread life and durability compared to many dedicated track-focused tires

Cons

  • Can become 'greasy' or lose grip when overheated during extended track sessions
  • Increased road noise compared to standard summer tires
  • Susceptibility to aquaplaning in deep standing water
  • Potential for tread chunking if driven aggressively on highly abrasive track surfaces

Observations

  • Lightweight sports cars (e.g., Lotus Elise, Mazda MX-5) report high satisfaction with the tire's responsiveness and feedback.
  • High-horsepower vehicles (e.g., 500+ whp M340i, 700whp builds) note that the tire provides excellent traction for street use, though some users with 400+ hp suggest even stickier compounds for pure drag-strip performance.
  • Users on 20-inch wheels occasionally report issues with tire uniformity or balancing, though this is less common on smaller diameter setups.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus R-S4 B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Category—Summer Extreme Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Yokohama

Too close to call: Hankook Ventus R-S4 and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus R-S4 is stronger on treadwear. Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is stronger on comfort and dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 77 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 86 vs 74 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 93 vs 87 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus R-S4
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.