Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Ventus R-S4 vs Toyo Proxes R888R — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Hankook Ventus R-S4 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
20 owner reviews
Dry
87
Wet
72
Comfort
61
Noise
–
Treadwear
86
Handling
88

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Toyo Proxes R888R tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
86/100
Owner ratings
Dry
92
Wet
54
Comfort
67
Noise
59
Treadwear
69
Handling
92

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Hankook Ventus R-S4 — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Toyo Proxes R888R if comfort, dry and handling matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

6 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Proxes R888R leads by 5
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
87
B — Toyo Proxes R888R
92
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Proxes R888R
Tire Rack owners 91 92
Tyre Reviews owners 87 –
SimpleTire owners – 100

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus R-S4 leads by 18
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
72
B — Toyo Proxes R888R
54
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Proxes R888R
Tire Rack owners 71 54
Tyre Reviews owners 72 –
SimpleTire owners – 65

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Proxes R888R leads by 6
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
61
B — Toyo Proxes R888R
67
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Proxes R888R
Tire Rack owners 75 67
Tyre Reviews owners 61 –
SimpleTire owners – 92

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
–
B — Toyo Proxes R888R
59
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Proxes R888R
SimpleTire owners – 70

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Ventus R-S4 leads by 17
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
86
B — Toyo Proxes R888R
69
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Proxes R888R
Tire Rack owners 87 69
Tyre Reviews owners 86 –
SimpleTire owners – 71

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Proxes R888R leads by 4
A — Hankook Ventus R-S4
88
B — Toyo Proxes R888R
92
Why this score
SourceVentus R-S4Proxes R888R
Tyre Reviews owners 88 –

Scores at a glance

Hankook Ventus R-S4 vs Toyo Proxes R888R: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus R-S4Toyo Proxes R888R
Relative Score 79 72
Dry 87 92
Wet 72 54
Comfort 61 67
Noise – 59
Treadwear 86 69
Handling 88 92

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Ventus R-S4

The Hankook Ventus RS4 is widely regarded as the industry benchmark for endurance-focused extreme performance summer tires. While it may not offer the absolute peak grip of specialized autocross tires, it is highly praised for its exceptional tread life, heat consistency, and value, making it a favorite for HPDE participants and endurance racers.

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and durability under heavy track abuse
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to more expensive competitors
  • Consistent dry grip and performance throughout the tire's lifespan
  • Predictable handling and excellent steering feedback
  • Strong heat resistance during long track sessions

Cons

  • Requires significant time and effort to reach optimal operating temperatures
  • Increased road noise and harsh ride quality compared to standard tires
  • Reduced traction in cold or wet conditions
  • Potential fitment issues due to narrow section width relative to nominal size

Observations

  • Lightweight FWD vehicles report excellent handling characteristics and high confidence with this tire.
  • Users note that the tire's sidewall width runs narrow, which may leave rims exposed if sized based on standard tire width expectations.
Tire B Toyo Proxes R888R

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus R-S4 B · Toyo Proxes R888R
Sizes available—48
Rim diameters—13″ – 20″
Tread depth—6.3/32″
UTQG—100 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Toyo

Winner: Hankook Ventus R-S4 — better wet and treadwear. Pick the Toyo Proxes R888R if comfort, dry and handling matter most to you.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 72 vs 54 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus R-S4 scores 86 vs 69 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Toyo Proxes R888R scores 67 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Toyo Proxes R888R scores 92 vs 87 on dry.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus R-S4
Tire B · Toyo Proxes R888R

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.