Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Hankook Ventus Z214 vs Nexen CP671 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Hankook

Hankook Ventus Z214

Summer Trackday and Competition tires

Hankook Ventus Z214 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
83/100
1 owner review
Dry
100
Wet
–
Comfort
50
Treadwear
70
Handling
90

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Nexen

Nexen CP671

Summer Touring tires

Nexen CP671 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
2 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
75
Comfort
85
Treadwear
70
Handling
80

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Nexen CP671 — better comfort. Pick the Hankook Ventus Z214 if dry and handling matter most to you.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

5 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus Z214 leads by 15
A — Hankook Ventus Z214
100
B — Nexen CP671
85
Why this score
SourceVentus Z214CP671
Tyre Reviews owners 100 85
SimpleTire owners – 94

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus Z214
–
B — Nexen CP671
75
Why this score
SourceVentus Z214CP671
Tyre Reviews owners – 75
SimpleTire owners – 90

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) CP671 leads by 35
A — Hankook Ventus Z214
50
B — Nexen CP671
85
Why this score
SourceVentus Z214CP671
Tyre Reviews owners 50 85
SimpleTire owners – 90

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100)
A — Hankook Ventus Z214
70
B — Nexen CP671
70
Why this score
SourceVentus Z214CP671
Tyre Reviews owners 70 70
SimpleTire owners – 89

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Ventus Z214 leads by 10
A — Hankook Ventus Z214
90
B — Nexen CP671
80
Why this score
SourceVentus Z214CP671
Tyre Reviews owners 90 80

Scores at a glance

Hankook Ventus Z214 vs Nexen CP671: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryHankook Ventus Z214Nexen CP671
Relative Score 76 78
Dry 100 85
Wet – 75
Comfort 50 85
Treadwear 70 70
Handling 90 80

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Hankook Ventus Z214

The Hankook Ventus Z214 is highly regarded as a dedicated track tire that offers exceptional grip and rapid warm-up times. Users emphasize that performance is heavily dependent on proper heat cycling and precise pressure management to maximize both longevity and traction.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry track grip
  • Rapid warm-up to operating temperature
  • High value for the price point
  • Surprisingly capable on damp track surfaces

Cons

  • Requires strict adherence to break-in procedures
  • Performance and longevity are highly sensitive to pressure management
  • Requires a 24-hour cooling period after initial heat cycling

Observations

  • Performance is optimized for dedicated track use rather than street driving.
  • Users note that the soft compound variant requires careful management to balance grip with tire life.
Tire B Nexen CP671

The Nexen CP671 is generally regarded as a durable, budget-friendly tire that offers reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions. While users appreciate its longevity and consistent handling, the experience is often tempered by noticeable road noise and structural aging issues over time.

Pros

  • Impressive tread longevity and lifespan
  • Reliable traction in both wet and dry weather
  • Predictable and stable handling characteristics

Cons

  • Significant road noise and cabin roar
  • Directional tread pattern complicates tire rotation
  • Tendency for rubber cracking as the tire ages

Observations

  • Demonstrated strong durability on compact diesel vehicles, achieving 30,000 miles with remaining tread depth.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Hankook Ventus Z214 B · Nexen CP671
CategorySummer Trackday and Competition tiresSummer Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—12
Rim diameters—15″ – 19″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—400 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—36 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Hankook

Nexen

Winner: Nexen CP671 — better comfort. Pick the Hankook Ventus Z214 if dry and handling matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen CP671 scores 85 vs 50 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Z214 scores 100 vs 85 on dry.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus Z214 scores 90 vs 80 on handling.

Tire A · Hankook Ventus Z214
Tire B · Nexen CP671

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.