67
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Nexen CP671 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
81/100
2 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Nexen CP671 — better comfort, handling and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 94 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 82 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 85 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Advantage T/A leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 89 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CP671 leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 80 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Nexen CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 78 |
| Dry | 80 | 85 |
| Wet | 67 | 75 |
| Snow | 20 | – |
| Comfort | 50 | 85 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 70 |
| Handling | 57 | 80 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
67
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Observations
- The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
The Nexen CP671 is generally regarded as a durable, budget-friendly tire that offers reliable grip in both wet and dry conditions. While users appreciate its longevity and consistent handling, the experience is often tempered by noticeable road noise and structural aging issues over time.
Pros
- Impressive tread longevity and lifespan
- Reliable traction in both wet and dry weather
- Predictable and stable handling characteristics
Cons
- Significant road noise and cabin roar
- Directional tread pattern complicates tire rotation
- Tendency for rubber cracking as the tire ages
Observations
- Demonstrated strong durability on compact diesel vehicles, achieving 30,000 miles with remaining tread depth.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Nexen CP671 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 12 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | 400 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 36 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
67
/ 100
BFGoodrich
78
/ 100
Nexen
Winner: Nexen CP671 — better comfort, handling and wet. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Nexen CP671 scores 85 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Nexen CP671 scores 80 vs 57 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Nexen CP671 scores 75 vs 67 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 75 vs 70 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Nexen CP671
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.