82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Winter i*cept RS vs Laufenn I Fit Ice — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
12 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Hankook Winter i*cept RS — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Laufenn I Fit Ice if dry matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
I Fit Ice leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept RS | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 75 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept RS leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept RS | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 61 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept RS | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | – | 77 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept RS leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept RS | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept RS leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept RS | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 50 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept RS leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept RS | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 58 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Winter i*cept RS | Laufenn I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 71 |
| Dry | 80 | 83 |
| Wet | 77 | 74 |
| Snow | – | 85 |
| Comfort | 82 | 75 |
| Noise | – | 75 |
| Treadwear | 90 | 67 |
| Handling | 77 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Winter i cept RS is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in snow and cold weather conditions. Users consistently praise its affordability and impressive traction, though it is noted to be less suited for high-speed motorway driving or warm, dry pavement.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and confidence in snowy conditions
- High value-for-money proposition
- Low rolling resistance contributing to improved fuel efficiency
- Durable tread life even with spirited driving
Cons
- Not optimized for high-speed motorway performance
- Soft compound feels unstable on dry, warm road surfaces
- Limited performance in non-winter conditions
Observations
- Users driving compact hatchbacks like the Alfa 147 and Fiat Grande Punto report excellent fuel economy gains compared to summer tires.
- The tire is highly recommended for rural or out-of-town commuters who encounter frequent snow rather than long-distance highway drivers.
The Laufenn I Fit Ice is a polarizing budget-friendly winter tire that receives high praise for its deep snow and ice traction, yet faces significant criticism regarding its wet-weather performance and noise levels. While many users find it to be an exceptional value for severe winter conditions, others report inconsistent handling and safety concerns in rainy or slushy environments.
Pros
- Excellent traction and stopping power in deep snow and on ice
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Effective resistance to hydroplaning in certain conditions
- Good grip on cold, dry pavement due to soft rubber compounds
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of grip on wet roads
- High levels of road noise
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Inconsistent handling characteristics
Observations
- Users operating these tires on AWD vehicles like the Subaru Outback reported high satisfaction with winter traction.
- Drivers of smaller passenger vehicles, such as the VW Jetta, noted significant improvements in hill-climbing capability on snow-covered back roads.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Winter i*cept RS | B · Laufenn I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Hankook
71
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Hankook Winter i*cept RS — better treadwear, handling and comfort. Pick the Laufenn I Fit Ice if dry matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Winter i*cept RS scores 90 vs 67 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Hankook Winter i*cept RS scores 77 vs 58 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Winter i*cept RS scores 82 vs 75 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Winter i*cept RS scores 77 vs 74 on wet.
Tire A · Hankook Winter i*cept RS
Tire B · Laufenn I Fit Ice
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Winter i*cept RS also compared with
Laufenn I Fit Ice also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.