Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 vs Laufenn I Fit Ice — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 75 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 92 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 61 |
| SimpleTire owners | 93 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 94 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 98 | 77 |
| SimpleTire owners | 99 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | 92 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 58 | 50 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak DM-V2 | I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 58 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | Laufenn I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 88 | 73 |
| Dry | 90 | 83 |
| Wet | 90 | 74 |
| Snow | 99 | 85 |
| Comfort | 90 | 75 |
| Noise | 88 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 82 | 67 |
| Handling | 80 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 is widely regarded as a premier dedicated winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and braking performance on snow and ice. While users acknowledge that the soft rubber compound leads to faster tread wear if used in warmer temperatures, the consensus is that the safety and handling benefits in harsh winter conditions far outweigh these longevity concerns.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and braking performance on snow and ice
- High level of driver confidence in severe winter weather
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Significant improvement over all-season tires for winter handling
Cons
- Faster tread wear compared to all-season tires
- Performance degrades if left on the vehicle during warmer spring/summer months
- Potential for reduced wet-weather grip as the tire wears down
Observations
- Users report excellent performance across a variety of vehicle types, including heavy SUVs like the BMW X5 and VW Touareg, as well as light trucks like the Ford F-150.
- Owners of hybrid vehicles noted that the tire's soft compound may wear more quickly under the specific torque characteristics of their vehicles.
- Some users successfully utilize oversized tire diameters for increased ground clearance in deep snow without sacrificing ride quality.
The Laufenn I Fit Ice is a polarizing budget-friendly winter tire that receives high praise for its deep snow and ice traction, yet faces significant criticism regarding its wet-weather performance and noise levels. While many users find it to be an exceptional value for severe winter conditions, others report inconsistent handling and safety concerns in rainy or slushy environments.
Pros
- Excellent traction and stopping power in deep snow and on ice
- High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
- Effective resistance to hydroplaning in certain conditions
- Good grip on cold, dry pavement due to soft rubber compounds
Cons
- Poor performance and lack of grip on wet roads
- High levels of road noise
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- Inconsistent handling characteristics
Observations
- Users operating these tires on AWD vehicles like the Subaru Outback reported high satisfaction with winter traction.
- Drivers of smaller passenger vehicles, such as the VW Jetta, noted significant improvements in hill-climbing capability on snow-covered back roads.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 | B · Laufenn I Fit Ice |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Winter Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 48 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 13/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Laufenn
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 80 vs 58 on handling.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 90 vs 74 on wet.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 90 vs 75 on comfort.
Bridgestone Blizzak DM-V2 scores 82 vs 67 on treadwear.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.