Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 90 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 84 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 95% | 96% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 97% | 100% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 84 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 90% | 98% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 96% | 96% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 81 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 92% | 97% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 91% | 94% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 75 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 59 | 63 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 85 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 79 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 81 |
| Dry | 89 | 87 |
| Wet | 86 | 85 |
| Snow | 82 | 84 |
| Comfort | 85 | 77 |
| Noise | 59 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 85 |
| Handling | 88 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 95% #8/10 · 2025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test | 96% #12/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -1 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #3/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -2.5 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% #1/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test | 88% #10/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +11.6 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 95% #3/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 99% #17/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -3.8 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 92% #9/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 73% #5/11 · 2018 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +19.3 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 90% #8/10 · 2025 AZ Performance Winter Tyre Test | 80% #13/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +10.1 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 74% #11/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 83% #2/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -8.5 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 100% #1/10 · 2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 33% #3/8 · 2021 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test | +66.7 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 92% #12/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 97% #7/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -4.7 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% #5/10 · 2025 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 99% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -0.9 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 91% #6/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 94% #3/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | -3.1 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 97% #7/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -3.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 95% #3/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 90% #4/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test | 80% #3/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +20 | Different tests |
| Subj. Snow Handling | Subj | 94% #3/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test | 60% #7/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +33.6 | Different tests |
| Subj. Wet Handling | Subj | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Die Reifentester Winter Tyre Test | 50% #6/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +50 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #14/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0% #18/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 90% #6/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 98% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -8.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #14/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 96% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -0.2 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is widely regarded as a premium, highly balanced winter tire that excels in wet and slushy conditions while offering exceptional comfort and low noise levels. Most users report high levels of confidence in varied winter weather, though a small minority of users report inconsistent performance in severe snow and ice, and some note that steering response is less sharp than dedicated performance-focused alternatives.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of cabin comfort and low road noise
- Strong, predictable grip on snow and slush
- Good balance of dry handling and rolling resistance
- Solid tread life and durability for a performance winter tire
Cons
- Premium price point compared to competitors
- Steering feel can be perceived as 'soft' or 'jelly' compared to summer tires
- Performance can drop off in temperatures above 8-10°C
- Inconsistent feedback regarding extreme ice traction
Observations
- EV and hybrid owners frequently praise the tire for its low rolling resistance and quiet operation.
- Drivers of high-performance RWD vehicles report that while the tire provides excellent grip, it may feel less stiff and sharp during aggressive cornering compared to summer counterparts.
- Users on larger wheel diameters (20-inch) report that the tire maintains high comfort levels without sacrificing handling.
The Hankook Winter i cept RS2 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in wet and slushy conditions, offering performance that often rivals premium brands at a significantly lower price point. While most users praise its traction in snow and rain, opinions are polarized regarding cabin noise and ride comfort, with several users noting a firm, sometimes noisy experience at highway speeds.
Pros
- Excellent value for money and competitive pricing
- Strong wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Reliable traction in snow and slush for daily commuting
Cons
- High noise levels, particularly at highway speeds
- Firm, stiff ride quality that transmits road imperfections
- Inconsistent performance on pure black ice
- Occasional reports of sluggish handling or lack of steering feedback
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Ford Fiesta, Dacia Logan) report high satisfaction with general winter traction.
- Some drivers noted that performance and comfort characteristics may vary significantly depending on the specific tire size, with smaller 14-inch sizes receiving fewer noise complaints than larger fitments.
- Drivers of heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally reported higher fuel consumption and a more noticeable impact on ride harshness.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | B · Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Hankook
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 if noise matters most to you.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 88 vs 79 on handling.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 85 vs 77 on comfort.
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 89 vs 85 on treadwear.
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 scores 63 vs 59 on noise.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.