81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
85/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
88/100
29 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
83/100
7 professional tests
User signal (40%)
80/100
50 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 and Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is stronger on comfort, handling and snow. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 is stronger on noise and dry.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept RS2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 84 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 96% | 98% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 100% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept RS2 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 84 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 91% | 98% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 100% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 81 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 99% | 97% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 99% | 99% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 89% | 94% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 75 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept RS2 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 50 | 63 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 79 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 81 |
| Dry | 84 | 87 |
| Wet | 84 | 85 |
| Snow | 89 | 84 |
| Comfort | 85 | 77 |
| Noise | 50 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 85 |
| Handling | 85 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
81
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #13/20 · 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 98% #3/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -2.5 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -2.1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 85% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 77% #18/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +7.9 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 98% #13/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 99% #17/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -1 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 95% #18/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 79% #11/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +16 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 74% #14/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 80% #13/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -5.8 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 74% #9/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 72% #14/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +1.6 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 9% #11/51 · 2025 Winter Tyre Braking Test - 52 Sets! | 33% #3/8 · 2021 Auto Express Winter Tyre Test | -24.2 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 99% #2/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 97% #8/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +1.8 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 99% #5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 99% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +0.1 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 89% #2/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 94% #3/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | -5.2 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 100% #1/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 90% #12/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +10.1 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 91% #6/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 90% #4/14 · 2020 Auto Zeitung Winter Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 0% #14/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #11/44 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | 98% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -7 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #8/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -2.4 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in severe snow and ice conditions. While users consistently praise its traction in challenging weather and its competitive pricing, some note a lack of steering feedback and reduced performance during spirited dry-road driving.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
- Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Generally low tread wear and good longevity for most drivers
Cons
- Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
- Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
- Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
- Potential for premature tread degradation under aggressive or sporty driving styles
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles and those towing trailers reported high stability and confidence in deep snow and arctic conditions.
- Users with electric power steering systems noted a lack of road feel, which can lead to understeer in front-wheel-drive vehicles with heavy front ends.
The Hankook Winter i cept RS2 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in wet and slushy conditions, offering performance that often rivals premium brands at a significantly lower price point. While most users praise its traction in snow and rain, opinions are polarized regarding cabin noise and ride comfort, with several users noting a firm, sometimes noisy experience at highway speeds.
Pros
- Excellent value for money and competitive pricing
- Strong wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- Reliable traction in snow and slush for daily commuting
Cons
- High noise levels, particularly at highway speeds
- Firm, stiff ride quality that transmits road imperfections
- Inconsistent performance on pure black ice
- Occasional reports of sluggish handling or lack of steering feedback
Observations
- Users with smaller, lighter vehicles (e.g., Ford Fiesta, Dacia Logan) report high satisfaction with general winter traction.
- Some drivers noted that performance and comfort characteristics may vary significantly depending on the specific tire size, with smaller 14-inch sizes receiving fewer noise complaints than larger fitments.
- Drivers of heavier or more powerful vehicles occasionally reported higher fuel consumption and a more noticeable impact on ride harshness.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | B · Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Premium Touring Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
BFGoodrich
81
/ 100
Hankook
Too close to call: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 and Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 are within 2 points overall. BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is stronger on comfort, handling and snow. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 is stronger on noise and dry.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 scores 63 vs 50 on noise.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 77 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 79 on handling.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 89 vs 84 on snow.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Tire B · Hankook Winter i*cept RS2
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 also compared with
Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.