81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
85/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
88/100
29 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
96/100
35 professional tests
User signal (40%)
71/100
110 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — better treadwear, snow and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 if noise and wet matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 77 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 94% | 99% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 97% | 100% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 91 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 84 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 91% | 91% |
| Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) | 91% | 81% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 96% | 99% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 95% | 98% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 72 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 100% | 86% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 97% | 96% |
| Snow Slalom (% of best) | 99% | 100% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 90% | 95% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 74 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM005 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 50 | 63 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 28
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 64 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 59 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
g-Force Winter 2 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 73 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 75 |
| Dry | 84 | 84 |
| Wet | 84 | 88 |
| Snow | 89 | 77 |
| Comfort | 85 | 80 |
| Noise | 50 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 59 |
| Handling | 85 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 90% #8/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 95% #2/9 · 2023 Tyre Reviews SUV Winter Tyre Test | -5.1 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #7/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 99% #6/7 · 2022 Sport Auto All Season Tyre Test | -5.2 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #20/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 100% #2/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -2.2 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 92% #5/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | 99% #3/10 · 2020 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -6.9 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 98% #7/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 98% #10/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 0 | Same test |
| Ice Braking | Ice | 89% #11/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 89% #12/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 0 | Same test |
| Abrasion | Other | 62% #2/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 100% #15/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | -37.8 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 93% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | 95% #3/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -1.9 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 82% #13/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 86% #6/10 · 2023 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -4.3 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 83% #9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 96% #17/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | -13.6 | Same test |
| Wear | Other | 82% #12/20 · 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 84% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | -1.9 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/15 · 2022 ADAC Winter Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 | 100% #1/48 · 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | -80 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 100% #1/31 · 2023 Winter Tyre Test 54 Set Braking Test | 86% #5/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +13.5 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 97% #13/20 · 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 96% #8/10 · 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test | +1.2 | Different tests |
| Snow Slalom | Snow | 99% #2/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/7 · 2022 Sport Auto All Season Tyre Test | -1.2 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 90% #4/20 · 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 95% #5/10 · 2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | -4.3 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 95% #5/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 98% #3/10 · 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test | -2.5 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 91% #6/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 100% #2/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -8.8 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #15/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 0% #6/6 · 2023/24 Tyre Reviews UHP Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #11/44 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | 91% #1/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | +0.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 91% #12/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 81% #1/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | +10.2 | Same test |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 96% #16/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 99% #2/10 · 2022 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -3.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 95% #11/13 · 2021 Auto Bild Sports Car Winter Tyre Test | 98% #3/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | -3.1 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in severe snow and ice conditions. While users consistently praise its traction in challenging weather and its competitive pricing, some note a lack of steering feedback and reduced performance during spirited dry-road driving.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
- Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Generally low tread wear and good longevity for most drivers
Cons
- Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
- Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
- Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
- Potential for premature tread degradation under aggressive or sporty driving styles
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles and those towing trailers reported high stability and confidence in deep snow and arctic conditions.
- Users with electric power steering systems noted a lack of road feel, which can lead to understeer in front-wheel-drive vehicles with heavy front ends.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 is widely regarded as a class-leading winter tire for wet and slushy conditions, offering exceptional grip and braking performance that rivals summer tires. While it performs reliably in fresh snow, user consensus indicates a significant decline in performance and tread life after the first two seasons, with many owners reporting premature wear and increased noise levels as the tire ages.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance.
- Predictable and stable handling on dry roads.
- Strong performance in slush and fresh snow when new.
- High levels of ride comfort and low noise levels during the initial phase of ownership.
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, often failing to last beyond 15,000–20,000 km.
- Significant performance degradation in snow and ice after the first or second season.
- Development of loud humming or buzzing noises as the tire ages.
- Reports of tread deformation, wobbly blocks, or uneven wear patterns.
Observations
- Heavy vehicles, including EVs and large SUVs, appear to accelerate the rapid tread wear observed by many users.
- Users with RWD vehicles noted that while the tire is predictable, it can struggle with traction on steep inclines once the tread depth drops below 5mm.
- Drivers of performance-oriented or heavier cars reported noticeable understeer during spirited driving in dry conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 11 |
| Rim diameters | — | 17″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
BFGoodrich
75
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 — better treadwear, snow and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 if noise and wet matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 87 vs 59 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 scores 63 vs 50 on noise.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 89 vs 77 on snow.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 73 on handling.
Tire A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.