Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 89 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 96% | 99% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 98% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 83 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 90 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 89% | 89% |
| Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) | 91% | 84% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 96% | 98% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 100% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 85 | 78 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 94 | 88 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 98% | 96% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 99% | 96% |
| Snow Slalom (% of best) | 99% | 96% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 92% | 80% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 81 | 74 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 92 | 87 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 50 | 71 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 87 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | g-Force Winter 2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | Vredestein Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 83 |
| Dry | 84 | 89 |
| Wet | 84 | 86 |
| Snow | 89 | 82 |
| Comfort | 85 | 79 |
| Noise | 50 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 87 | 87 |
| Handling | 85 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 90% #8/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 80% #8/9 · 2022/23 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | +9.5 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #11/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 99% #6/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -2.7 | Same test |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #12/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 98% #11/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Same test |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 80% #7/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 89% #7/10 · 2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | -8.6 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 98% #7/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 100% #12/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
| Ice Braking | Ice | 89% #11/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 100% #1/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | -11.4 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 62% #2/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 74% #10/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | -11.5 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 96% #8/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 94% #14/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | +2 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 77% #11/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Winter 17 inch Tyre Test | 94% #7/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | -17.4 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 81% #12/20 · 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 90% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | -8.4 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 82% #12/20 · 2024 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 69% #19/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +12.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/16 · 2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter Tyre Test | 17% #6/45 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | +3.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 98% #4/35 · 2021 Winter Tyre Market Overview | 96% #4/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | +2 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 99% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | 96% #7/8 · 2022 AMS Winter Tyre Test | +2.7 | Different tests |
| Snow Slalom | Snow | 99% #2/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 96% #9/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +3.3 | Same test |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 92% #2/10 · 2021 AMS Winter Tyre Test | 80% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | +12 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 94% #7/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 95% #13/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -0.6 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 91% #6/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 92% #8/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -0.8 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #14/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | 0% #20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 89% #7/48 · 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | 89% #8/15 · 2023 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 91% #12/16 · 2023 ADAC 16 Inch Tyre Test | 84% #5/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | +6.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 96% #16/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 98% #6/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test | -1.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #9/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test | -2.2 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that excels in severe snow and ice conditions. While users consistently praise its traction in challenging weather and its competitive pricing, some note a lack of steering feedback and reduced performance during spirited dry-road driving.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip in deep snow and on ice
- Strong performance in wet conditions with effective water evacuation
- High value-for-money ratio compared to premium competitors
- Generally low tread wear and good longevity for most drivers
Cons
- Lack of on-center steering feel and responsiveness
- Mediocre handling and grip during dry-road driving
- Increased noise levels on certain road surfaces
- Potential for premature tread degradation under aggressive or sporty driving styles
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles and those towing trailers reported high stability and confidence in deep snow and arctic conditions.
- Users with electric power steering systems noted a lack of road feel, which can lead to understeer in front-wheel-drive vehicles with heavy front ends.
The Vredestein Wintrac Pro is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that bridges the gap between dedicated winter traction and the handling characteristics of a summer tire. Users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather performance, steering feedback, and stability at high speeds, making it a favorite for owners of performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- High-speed stability and responsive steering feedback
- Strong performance in cold, dry conditions
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Predictable handling and confidence-inspiring snow traction
Cons
- Noticeable increase in fuel consumption/rolling resistance
- Potential for accelerated tread wear if used in warmer temperatures
- Occasional reports of noise or 'squealing' during hard cornering in dry conditions
- Some users noted reduced traction when starting from a standstill on deep snow
Observations
- Performance sedan and coupe owners (e.g., BMW M-series, Audi S-series) report the tire maintains a 'summer-like' handling feel while providing necessary winter safety.
- Heavy vehicle owners (SUVs/Vans) report mixed results; while some appreciate the stability, others noted uneven wear patterns or reduced cornering precision on heavy commercial chassis.
- Drivers of high-horsepower RWD vehicles specifically highlight the tire's ability to manage torque and minimize wheelspin in cold conditions.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 | B · Vredestein Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Premium Touring Winter tire | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
BFGoodrich
Vredestein
Winner: Vredestein Wintrac Pro — better noise and dry. Pick the BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 if snow, comfort and handling matter most to you.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 71 vs 50 on noise.
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 89 vs 82 on snow.
BFGoodrich g-Force Winter 2 scores 85 vs 79 on comfort.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 89 vs 84 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.