Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 89 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 83 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 90 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 78 |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 88 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 74 |
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 87 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 71 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 87 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | Vredestein Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 85 |
| Dry | 84 | 89 |
| Wet | 70 | 86 |
| Snow | 70 | 82 |
| Comfort | 72 | 79 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 87 |
| Handling | 69 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 receives a polarized reception from users, with performance heavily dependent on driving style and specific winter conditions. While many owners praise its exceptional traction in deep snow and ice, a significant portion of users report disappointing grip in wet conditions and an increase in road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow and icy conditions
- Reliable performance on dry, cold pavement
- Robust construction and durability against road hazards
- Consistent tread life over multiple winter seasons
Cons
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
- Noticeable increase in road noise and humming as the tire ages
- Vague steering feedback and unpredictable handling at the limit
- Tendency to lose traction during rapid acceleration
Observations
- Rear-wheel drive vehicle owners reported significant issues with traction and unpredictable oversteer in wet conditions.
- Users on smaller, lower-torque vehicles noted that the tires still struggled to maintain grip during aggressive acceleration.
The Vredestein Wintrac Pro is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that bridges the gap between dedicated winter traction and the handling characteristics of a summer tire. Users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather performance, steering feedback, and stability at high speeds, making it a favorite for owners of performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- High-speed stability and responsive steering feedback
- Strong performance in cold, dry conditions
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Predictable handling and confidence-inspiring snow traction
Cons
- Noticeable increase in fuel consumption/rolling resistance
- Potential for accelerated tread wear if used in warmer temperatures
- Occasional reports of noise or 'squealing' during hard cornering in dry conditions
- Some users noted reduced traction when starting from a standstill on deep snow
Observations
- Performance sedan and coupe owners (e.g., BMW M-series, Audi S-series) report the tire maintains a 'summer-like' handling feel while providing necessary winter safety.
- Heavy vehicle owners (SUVs/Vans) report mixed results; while some appreciate the stability, others noted uneven wear patterns or reduced cornering precision on heavy commercial chassis.
- Drivers of high-horsepower RWD vehicles specifically highlight the tire's ability to manage torque and minimize wheelspin in cold conditions.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | B · Vredestein Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Vredestein
Winner: Vredestein Wintrac Pro — better wet, handling and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 86 vs 70 on wet.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 82 vs 69 on handling.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 82 vs 70 on snow.
Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 79 vs 72 on comfort.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.