Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
19 owner reviews
Dry
84
Wet
70
Snow
70
Comfort
72
Noise
–
Treadwear
81
Handling
69

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Vredestein

Vredestein Wintrac Pro

Winter Ultra High Performance tires

Vredestein Wintrac Pro tread pattern
Objective (60%)
93/100
32 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
30 owner reviews
Dry
89
Wet
86
Snow
82
Comfort
79
Noise
71
Treadwear
87
Handling
82

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Vredestein Wintrac Pro — better wet, handling and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Wintrac Pro leads by 5
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
84
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
89
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Wintrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) – 89
Tire Rack owners 87 89
Tyre Reviews owners 84 89

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Wintrac Pro leads by 16
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
70
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
86
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Wintrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) – 83
Tire Rack owners 88 91
Tyre Reviews owners 70 90

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Wintrac Pro leads by 12
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
70
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
82
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Wintrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) – 78
Tire Rack owners 86 89
Tyre Reviews owners 70 88

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Wintrac Pro leads by 7
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
72
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
79
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Wintrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) – 74
Tire Rack owners 85 87
Tyre Reviews owners 72 87

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
–
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
71
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Wintrac Pro
Professional tests (TWG score) – 71

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Wintrac Pro leads by 6
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
81
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
87
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Wintrac Pro
Tire Rack owners 81 86
Tyre Reviews owners 81 87

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Wintrac Pro leads by 13
A — Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
69
B — Vredestein Wintrac Pro
82
Why this score
SourceBlizzak LM-32Wintrac Pro
Tyre Reviews owners 69 82

Scores at a glance

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Blizzak LM-32Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Relative Score 75 85
Dry 84 89
Wet 70 86
Snow 70 82
Comfort 72 79
Noise – 71
Treadwear 81 87
Handling 69 82

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32

The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 receives a polarized reception from users, with performance heavily dependent on driving style and specific winter conditions. While many owners praise its exceptional traction in deep snow and ice, a significant portion of users report disappointing grip in wet conditions and an increase in road noise as the tread wears down.

Pros

  • Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow and icy conditions
  • Reliable performance on dry, cold pavement
  • Robust construction and durability against road hazards
  • Consistent tread life over multiple winter seasons

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
  • Noticeable increase in road noise and humming as the tire ages
  • Vague steering feedback and unpredictable handling at the limit
  • Tendency to lose traction during rapid acceleration

Observations

  • Rear-wheel drive vehicle owners reported significant issues with traction and unpredictable oversteer in wet conditions.
  • Users on smaller, lower-torque vehicles noted that the tires still struggled to maintain grip during aggressive acceleration.
Tire B Vredestein Wintrac Pro

The Vredestein Wintrac Pro is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that bridges the gap between dedicated winter traction and the handling characteristics of a summer tire. Users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather performance, steering feedback, and stability at high speeds, making it a favorite for owners of performance-oriented vehicles.

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • High-speed stability and responsive steering feedback
  • Strong performance in cold, dry conditions
  • Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
  • Predictable handling and confidence-inspiring snow traction

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in fuel consumption/rolling resistance
  • Potential for accelerated tread wear if used in warmer temperatures
  • Occasional reports of noise or 'squealing' during hard cornering in dry conditions
  • Some users noted reduced traction when starting from a standstill on deep snow

Observations

  • Performance sedan and coupe owners (e.g., BMW M-series, Audi S-series) report the tire maintains a 'summer-like' handling feel while providing necessary winter safety.
  • Heavy vehicle owners (SUVs/Vans) report mixed results; while some appreciate the stability, others noted uneven wear patterns or reduced cornering precision on heavy commercial chassis.
  • Drivers of high-horsepower RWD vehicles specifically highlight the tire's ability to manage torque and minimize wheelspin in cold conditions.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 B · Vredestein Wintrac Pro
Category—Winter Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone

Vredestein

Winner: Vredestein Wintrac Pro — better wet, handling and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 86 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 82 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 82 vs 70 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 79 vs 72 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Tire B · Vredestein Wintrac Pro

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.