75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
66/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
84/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 if comfort and snow matter most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 58 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 88 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 55 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 86 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Blizzak WS90 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 65 |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | 93 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 100 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 91 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak WS90 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 86 |
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 85 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 64 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 77 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 73 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 82 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 65 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 73 |
| Dry | 84 | 68 |
| Wet | 70 | 67 |
| Snow | 70 | 76 |
| Comfort | 72 | 84 |
| Noise | – | 77 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 79 |
| Handling | 69 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
73
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 receives a polarized reception from users, with performance heavily dependent on driving style and specific winter conditions. While many owners praise its exceptional traction in deep snow and ice, a significant portion of users report disappointing grip in wet conditions and an increase in road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow and icy conditions
- Reliable performance on dry, cold pavement
- Robust construction and durability against road hazards
- Consistent tread life over multiple winter seasons
Cons
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
- Noticeable increase in road noise and humming as the tire ages
- Vague steering feedback and unpredictable handling at the limit
- Tendency to lose traction during rapid acceleration
Observations
- Rear-wheel drive vehicle owners reported significant issues with traction and unpredictable oversteer in wet conditions.
- Users on smaller, lower-torque vehicles noted that the tires still struggled to maintain grip during aggressive acceleration.
The Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is widely regarded as a top-tier winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and confidence-inspiring performance on ice, deep snow, and slush. While users occasionally note increased road noise or less precise handling on dry pavement compared to all-season alternatives, the consensus remains that it is a premier choice for severe winter climates.
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
- High level of driver confidence in extreme weather
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
- Perceived as less refined in dry conditions compared to the previous WS80 generation
Observations
- Users operating rear-wheel-drive vehicles without modern traction control reported high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain mobility.
- Drivers of front-wheel-drive sedans noted significant improvements in winter handling and the ability to avoid using four-wheel-drive modes in moderate conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 45 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Bridgestone
73
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 — better dry, handling and wet. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 if comfort and snow matter most to you.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 84 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 84 vs 72 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 scores 76 vs 70 on snow.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 69 vs 65 on handling.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.