75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
71/100
19 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 vs Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
70/100
10 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 — better wet, snow and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | 87 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 75 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 87 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 79 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 77 |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 90 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 72 | 75 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 33 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM-32 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Blizzak LM001 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM-32 | Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 76 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 78 |
| Dry | 84 | 83 |
| Wet | 70 | 82 |
| Snow | 70 | 77 |
| Comfort | 72 | 70 |
| Noise | – | 36 |
| Treadwear | 81 | 78 |
| Handling | 69 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
75
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM32 receives a polarized reception from users, with performance heavily dependent on driving style and specific winter conditions. While many owners praise its exceptional traction in deep snow and ice, a significant portion of users report disappointing grip in wet conditions and an increase in road noise as the tread wears down.
Pros
- Outstanding traction and confidence in deep snow and icy conditions
- Reliable performance on dry, cold pavement
- Robust construction and durability against road hazards
- Consistent tread life over multiple winter seasons
Cons
- Poor wet-weather grip and susceptibility to hydroplaning
- Noticeable increase in road noise and humming as the tire ages
- Vague steering feedback and unpredictable handling at the limit
- Tendency to lose traction during rapid acceleration
Observations
- Rear-wheel drive vehicle owners reported significant issues with traction and unpredictable oversteer in wet conditions.
- Users on smaller, lower-torque vehicles noted that the tires still struggled to maintain grip during aggressive acceleration.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that excels in deep snow and icy conditions, offering drivers significant confidence in adverse weather. While it receives high praise for its traction and handling, user experiences are polarized regarding its longevity, noise levels, and performance on wet or dry pavement.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and icy conditions
- Precise handling and stability on cold, winter-affected roads
- Reliable braking performance in severe weather
- Satisfactory comfort levels for a dedicated winter tire
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- High noise levels on dry asphalt
- Increased fuel consumption compared to other winter tires
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance on certain vehicle types
Observations
- High-torque or high-performance vehicles (e.g., DB11, tuned GTI) may experience increased traction control intervention or accelerated wear.
- Compatibility issues noted with specific AWD platforms like the Subaru Forester, where premature wear was reported.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 | B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
75
/ 100
Bridgestone
78
/ 100
Bridgestone
Winner: Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 — better wet, snow and handling. Pick the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 82 vs 70 on wet.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 77 vs 70 on snow.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 scores 76 vs 69 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 scores 81 vs 78 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32
Tire B · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-32 also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.