73
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
70/100
10 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 vs Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
94/100
21 professional tests
User signal (40%)
86/100
29 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 — better comfort, handling and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 94 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 90 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 96% | 95% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 97% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | 84 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 90 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 91% | 95% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 97% | 93% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | 79 |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 88 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 92% | 100% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 98% | 93% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 90 |
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 81 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 33 | 47 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 88 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Pilot Alpin 5 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 89 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 | Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 83 |
| Dry | 83 | 92 |
| Wet | 82 | 86 |
| Snow | 77 | 83 |
| Comfort | 70 | 87 |
| Noise | 36 | 47 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 88 |
| Handling | 76 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
Tire A
83
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #10/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 95% #1/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test | +1.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 97% #2/6 · The BEST Performance Winter Tyres for 2024 / 2025 | +2.1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 85% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 87% #5/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -1.9 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 95% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 94% #3/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | +1.4 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 84% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 100% #11/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -16.2 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/20 · 2025 Autobild Winter Tyre Test | -83.3 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 92% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 100% #1/30 · 2020 Winter Tyre Market Overview - 52 Tyre Braking Test | -8.1 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% #6/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 93% #1/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | +5.3 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 100% #1/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 94% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | +5.7 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #7/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 95% #5/12 · 2024 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -4.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 93% #3/6 · The BEST Performance Winter Tyres for 2024 / 2025 | +4.8 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that excels in deep snow and icy conditions, offering drivers significant confidence in adverse weather. While it receives high praise for its traction and handling, user experiences are polarized regarding its longevity, noise levels, and performance on wet or dry pavement.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and icy conditions
- Precise handling and stability on cold, winter-affected roads
- Reliable braking performance in severe weather
- Satisfactory comfort levels for a dedicated winter tire
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- High noise levels on dry asphalt
- Increased fuel consumption compared to other winter tires
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance on certain vehicle types
Observations
- High-torque or high-performance vehicles (e.g., DB11, tuned GTI) may experience increased traction control intervention or accelerated wear.
- Compatibility issues noted with specific AWD platforms like the Subaru Forester, where premature wear was reported.
The Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 is widely regarded as a premier Ultra-High Performance (UHP) winter tire, excelling in dry and wet handling while maintaining strong snow traction. While it offers a driving experience comparable to summer tires, some users find it sacrifices ride comfort and noise levels for its sporty, responsive characteristics.
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet road handling
- Strong traction and stability in snow
- High level of steering feedback and responsiveness
- Excellent tread wear longevity for a performance tire
Cons
- Mediocre performance on pure ice
- Noticeable road noise and humming at highway speeds
- Stiffer ride quality compared to comfort-oriented winter tires
- Poor performance in deep slush
Observations
- Drivers of heavy vehicles, such as the Audi A8L, report excellent lateral stability but note that braking on hard-packed snow can be compromised compared to dedicated Nordic-style winter tires.
- Users with staggered wheel setups (e.g., 225 front/255 rear) have reported increased cabin noise and resonance at highway speeds.
- Performance enthusiasts note that the tire's sidewall design and responsiveness make it ideal for spirited driving, though it may feel 'bumpy' on uneven road surfaces.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 | B · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Bridgestone
83
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 — better comfort, handling and noise. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 87 vs 70 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 89 vs 76 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want a quieter cabin
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 47 vs 36 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 scores 88 vs 78 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Alpin 5
More comparisons
Also compared with
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 also compared with
Michelin Pilot Alpin 5 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.