Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 vs Michelin Alpin 5 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 84 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 96% | 96% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 99% | 99% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | 86 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 90 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 91% | 92% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 97% | 98% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | 80 |
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 91 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 92% | 95% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 98% | 96% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 85 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 33 | 96 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 90 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak LM001 | Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 | Michelin Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 87 |
| Dry | 83 | 87 |
| Wet | 82 | 87 |
| Snow | 77 | 84 |
| Comfort | 70 | 85 |
| Noise | 36 | 96 |
| Treadwear | 78 | 90 |
| Handling | 76 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 96% #10/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 96% #7/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 99% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -0.3 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 85% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 76% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +9 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 95% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 100% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -4.6 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 84% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 92% #19/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -8.4 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 13% #8/12 · 2018 ACE All Season and Winter Tyre Test | 9% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +3.4 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 92% #8/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 95% #17/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -3.1 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% #6/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 96% #18/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +2.4 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 100% #1/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 95% #4/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +5.1 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #7/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 92% #17/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -1.3 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | 98% #8/20 · 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | -0.8 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that excels in deep snow and icy conditions, offering drivers significant confidence in adverse weather. While it receives high praise for its traction and handling, user experiences are polarized regarding its longevity, noise levels, and performance on wet or dry pavement.
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow and icy conditions
- Precise handling and stability on cold, winter-affected roads
- Reliable braking performance in severe weather
- Satisfactory comfort levels for a dedicated winter tire
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some users
- High noise levels on dry asphalt
- Increased fuel consumption compared to other winter tires
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance on certain vehicle types
Observations
- High-torque or high-performance vehicles (e.g., DB11, tuned GTI) may experience increased traction control intervention or accelerated wear.
- Compatibility issues noted with specific AWD platforms like the Subaru Forester, where premature wear was reported.
The Michelin Alpin 5 is widely regarded as a top-tier winter tire, praised for its exceptional traction in snow and wet conditions. While users consistently highlight its longevity and comfort, some note that its performance degrades after three years and that the soft compound is not suitable for warm, dry weather.
Pros
- Exceptional snow and ice traction
- Outstanding wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
- High durability and long tread life
- Excellent ride comfort and low noise levels
Cons
- Performance degradation after 3 years of use
- Soft sidewalls lead to vague handling in corners
- Poor performance and 'smearing' in temperatures above 20°C
- Lack of rim protection
Observations
- Drivers of smaller, lighter vehicles like the Mini Cooper S and Skoda Yeti report significant improvements in driving feel and comfort.
- Users note that the tire's soft sidewalls are beneficial for comfort but detrimental to handling precision on sportier vehicle setups.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak LM001 | B · Michelin Alpin 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 10 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Michelin
Winner: Michelin Alpin 5 — better noise, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Michelin Alpin 5 scores 96 vs 36 on noise.
Michelin Alpin 5 scores 85 vs 70 on comfort.
Michelin Alpin 5 scores 90 vs 78 on treadwear.
Michelin Alpin 5 scores 84 vs 77 on snow.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.