84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
71/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
79/100
28 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 vs Vredestein Wintrac Pro — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
93/100
32 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
30 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 and Vredestein Wintrac Pro are within 2 points overall. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 is stronger on noise and comfort. Vredestein Wintrac Pro is stronger on dry and treadwear.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Wintrac Pro leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 77 | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 84 | 89 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 91% | 99% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 99% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Wintrac Pro leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 83 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 91 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 90 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 96% | 99% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 98% | 90% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 89 | 78 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 89 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 88 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 97% | 97% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 99% | 98% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo2 leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 74 |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Winter i*cept evo2 leads by 29
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 100 | 71 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Wintrac Pro leads by 4
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 86 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 87 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Wintrac Pro leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Winter i*cept evo2 | Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 82 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 | Vredestein Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 84 | 83 |
| Dry | 80 | 89 |
| Wet | 84 | 86 |
| Snow | 82 | 82 |
| Comfort | 82 | 79 |
| Noise | 100 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 83 | 87 |
| Handling | 81 | 82 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
84
/ 100
Tire A
83
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% #11/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 99% #2/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | -7.9 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #7/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 99% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | -1.3 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 78% #11/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 91% #5/10 · 2018 Autobild UHP Winter Tyre Test | -12.9 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #11/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 96% #3/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | +4 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 71% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 74% #5/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | -2.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 20% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 5% #20/56 · 2022 Winter Tyre Market Overview | +15 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 97% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 97% #4/10 · 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test | -0.2 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 99% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 98% #7/10 · 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test | +0.8 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 93% #9/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 96% #3/10 · 2021 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | -3.4 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 96% #3/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 99% #2/10 · 2021 AZ SUV Winter Tyre Test | -3 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 98% #3/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | 90% #9/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | +7.9 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Winter i cept evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented winter tire that performs reliably in mild to moderate winter conditions. While it excels in noise reduction and ride quality, user consensus is mixed regarding its performance in deep snow and its longevity, with some users noting a significant drop-off in grip as the tread wears down over several seasons.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low noise levels
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Predictable and progressive handling in wet and dry conditions
- Good traction in light to moderate snow and slush
Cons
- Noticeable decline in performance and grip as the tire ages/tread wears
- Struggles in deep snow or extreme winter conditions
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback during spirited driving
- Increased fuel consumption reported by some users
Observations
- BMW owners frequently use these as a comfortable alternative to factory run-flat tires, noting improved ride quality.
- Performance on RWD vehicles in deep snow is reported as inconsistent, with some users experiencing significant traction loss.
- Users with high-torque vehicles noted that the tire can struggle to put power down effectively on dry pavement.
The Vredestein Wintrac Pro is widely regarded as a high-performance winter tire that bridges the gap between dedicated winter traction and the handling characteristics of a summer tire. Users consistently praise its exceptional wet-weather performance, steering feedback, and stability at high speeds, making it a favorite for owners of performance-oriented vehicles.
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
- High-speed stability and responsive steering feedback
- Strong performance in cold, dry conditions
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
- Predictable handling and confidence-inspiring snow traction
Cons
- Noticeable increase in fuel consumption/rolling resistance
- Potential for accelerated tread wear if used in warmer temperatures
- Occasional reports of noise or 'squealing' during hard cornering in dry conditions
- Some users noted reduced traction when starting from a standstill on deep snow
Observations
- Performance sedan and coupe owners (e.g., BMW M-series, Audi S-series) report the tire maintains a 'summer-like' handling feel while providing necessary winter safety.
- Heavy vehicle owners (SUVs/Vans) report mixed results; while some appreciate the stability, others noted uneven wear patterns or reduced cornering precision on heavy commercial chassis.
- Drivers of high-horsepower RWD vehicles specifically highlight the tire's ability to manage torque and minimize wheelspin in cold conditions.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 | B · Vredestein Wintrac Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Ultra High Performance Winter tire | Winter Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
84
/ 100
Hankook
83
/ 100
Vredestein
Too close to call: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 and Vredestein Wintrac Pro are within 2 points overall. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 is stronger on noise and comfort. Vredestein Wintrac Pro is stronger on dry and treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 scores 100 vs 71 on noise.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 89 vs 80 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Vredestein Wintrac Pro scores 87 vs 83 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 scores 82 vs 79 on comfort.
Tire A · Hankook Winter i*cept evo2
Tire B · Vredestein Wintrac Pro
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 also compared with
Vredestein Wintrac Pro also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.