Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 vs Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter i*cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 58 | 77 |
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 84 |
| SimpleTire owners | 88 | – |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 90% | 91% |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter i*cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 55 | 88 |
| Tire Rack owners | 91 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | 86 | – |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 79% | 96% |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter i*cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 65 | 89 |
| Tire Rack owners | 93 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 100 | 73 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 98% | 97% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 85% | 99% |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter i*cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 86 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | 85 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 64 | 82 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter i*cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 100 |
| SimpleTire owners | 77 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter i*cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 82 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Blizzak WS90 | Winter i*cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 81 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 84 |
| Dry | 68 | 80 |
| Wet | 67 | 84 |
| Snow | 76 | 82 |
| Comfort | 84 | 82 |
| Noise | 77 | 100 |
| Treadwear | 79 | 83 |
| Handling | 65 | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 90% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 91% #11/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | -1.1 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/19 · The Best Winter Tyres for 2020 | 20% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | +30 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 98% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 97% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | +1.4 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 85% #6/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 99% #5/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | -13.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 79% #7/10 · 2026 Tire Rack All-Weather vs Winter Tyre Test | 96% #3/11 · 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test | -16.9 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is widely regarded as a top-tier winter tire, consistently praised for its exceptional traction and confidence-inspiring performance on ice, deep snow, and slush. While users occasionally note increased road noise or less precise handling on dry pavement compared to all-season alternatives, the consensus remains that it is a premier choice for severe winter climates.
Pros
- Outstanding grip and acceleration on ice and hard-packed snow
- Excellent braking performance in hazardous winter conditions
- Strong capability in slush and deep snow
- High level of driver confidence in extreme weather
Cons
- Increased road noise during highway driving
- Less responsive or 'softer' handling feel on dry pavement
- Potential for minor rubbing depending on vehicle fitment
- Perceived as less refined in dry conditions compared to the previous WS80 generation
Observations
- Users operating rear-wheel-drive vehicles without modern traction control reported high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain mobility.
- Drivers of front-wheel-drive sedans noted significant improvements in winter handling and the ability to avoid using four-wheel-drive modes in moderate conditions.
The Hankook Winter i cept evo2 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfort-oriented winter tire that performs reliably in mild to moderate winter conditions. While it excels in noise reduction and ride quality, user consensus is mixed regarding its performance in deep snow and its longevity, with some users noting a significant drop-off in grip as the tread wears down over several seasons.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and low noise levels
- Strong value-for-money proposition compared to premium competitors
- Predictable and progressive handling in wet and dry conditions
- Good traction in light to moderate snow and slush
Cons
- Noticeable decline in performance and grip as the tire ages/tread wears
- Struggles in deep snow or extreme winter conditions
- Soft sidewalls can lead to vague steering feedback during spirited driving
- Increased fuel consumption reported by some users
Observations
- BMW owners frequently use these as a comfortable alternative to factory run-flat tires, noting improved ride quality.
- Performance on RWD vehicles in deep snow is reported as inconsistent, with some users experiencing significant traction loss.
- Users with high-torque vehicles noted that the tire can struggle to put power down effectively on dry pavement.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 | B · Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Ultra High Performance Winter tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone
Hankook
Winner: Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 — better noise, wet and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 scores 100 vs 77 on noise.
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 scores 84 vs 67 on wet.
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 scores 81 vs 65 on handling.
Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 scores 80 vs 68 on dry.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.