71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
70/100
21 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 vs Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
75
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
75/100
27 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
5 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HM KH31 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Ecsta HM KH31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 76 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HM KH31 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Ecsta HM KH31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | 73 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Ecsta HM KH31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 78 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecowing ES01 KH27 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Ecsta HM KH31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 72 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta HM KH31 leads by 13
Why this score
| Source | Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Ecsta HM KH31 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | 74 |
| DriverReviews owners | 82 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 | Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 75 |
| Dry | 76 | 81 |
| Wet | 62 | 73 |
| Comfort | 80 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 77 | 72 |
| Handling | 61 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
71
/ 100
Tire A
75
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 presents a highly polarized user experience, often described as either an excellent value-oriented eco-tire or a dangerous liability. While many owners praise its fuel efficiency, low noise levels, and comfort for daily commuting, a significant segment of users reports severe concerns regarding wet-weather traction and unpredictable handling during cornering.
Pros
- High fuel efficiency and rolling resistance improvements
- Low road noise and quiet operation
- Good ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong value for money for casual, non-aggressive driving
Cons
- Unpredictable and poor wet-weather grip
- Tendency to slip or lose traction on roundabouts and corners
- Soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' or unstable handling feel
- High-pitched screeching noise when pushed in dry conditions
Observations
- Users driving smaller hatchbacks like the Honda Jazz or VW Up report significant confidence issues with rear-end stability on roundabouts.
- Drivers on rougher road surfaces, such as those in Kenya, noted that while tread life is impressive, the sidewalls are susceptible to damage from potholes.
The Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 is widely regarded as a high-value tire that offers a compelling balance of comfort, low noise, and reliable grip for daily driving. While the majority of users praise its performance-to-price ratio, there is a notable divide in user experience, with some reporting exceptional longevity and handling, while others cite inconsistent wet-weather performance and premature wear.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
- Low road noise and high levels of ride comfort
- Strong dry-weather handling and cornering confidence
- Good longevity for many users under varied driving conditions
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather grip reported by some users
- Reports of premature or uneven tread wear on certain vehicles
- Occasional complaints regarding sidewall durability and road hazard susceptibility
- Subjective 'plastic' feel or lack of steering feedback for performance-oriented drivers
Observations
- Users with smaller, performance-oriented hatchbacks (e.g., Peugeot 106 GTI) found the tire to be an excellent, cost-effective solution for awkward wheel sizes.
- Drivers of heavier vehicles and MPVs reported high satisfaction with the tire's ability to maintain composure and tread life during long-distance highway driving.
- Some owners of rear-wheel-drive sedans reported rapid outer-edge wear, suggesting the tire may be sensitive to alignment or specific suspension geometries.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 | B · Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
71
/ 100
Kumho
75
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 scores 74 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 scores 73 vs 62 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 scores 77 vs 72 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 scores 81 vs 76 on dry.
Tire A · Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta HM KH31
More comparisons
Also compared with
Kumho Ecowing ES01 KH27 also compared with
Kumho Ecsta HM KH31 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.