79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
77/100
84 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 vs Kumho Ecsta KU39 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
125 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 and Kumho Ecsta KU39 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 is stronger on wet.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 86 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Ventus S1 evo3 leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 78 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU39 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 81 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU39 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 57 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 69 | 73 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU39 leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Ventus S1 evo3 | Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 76 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 | Kumho Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 78 |
| Dry | 86 | 86 |
| Wet | 84 | 78 |
| Snow | 80 | – |
| Comfort | 79 | 81 |
| Noise | 80 | – |
| Treadwear | 71 | 73 |
| Handling | 74 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3 is widely regarded as a high-value, comfortable summer tire that excels in wet and dry traction, often serving as a competent OEM choice for premium vehicles. While many users praise its ride quality and wet-weather confidence, a significant portion of enthusiasts note a lack of steering feedback and 'soft' sidewall characteristics that can make the handling feel less precise compared to top-tier competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport series.
Pros
- Excellent wet-weather grip and hydroplaning resistance
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Strong dry-road traction and predictable handling at the limit
- Competitive pricing relative to premium performance alternatives
- Good overall durability for many daily driving applications
Cons
- Lack of steering precision and 'numb' road feedback
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a wobbly or unstable feel during aggressive cornering
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear on specific vehicle platforms
- Occasional reports of sidewall bubbling or structural issues on rough road surfaces
Observations
- Users with heavy EVs and SUVs often report mixed results, with some praising the low rolling resistance and comfort, while others note rapid tread wear.
- Drivers of performance-oriented sedans (e.g., BMW 3-series, Audi S3) frequently highlight the tire's comfort advantage over competitors but criticize the lack of sharp steering response.
- The tire is frequently noted as a significant upgrade over stock Pirelli P Zero or Dunlop Sport Maxx tires in terms of wet-weather confidence and noise reduction.
The Kumho Ecsta KU39 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers a compelling alternative to premium brands. Users consistently praise its excellent dry and wet grip, comfort, and low noise levels, often noting that it outperforms more expensive tires while significantly reducing road noise and harshness. While most users are satisfied with the performance, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and a soft sidewall that can impact handling precision during aggressive cornering.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet and dry traction
- Outstanding ride comfort and low road noise
- Progressive and predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of steering sharpness or 'squirm' under heavy load
- Performance can drop off noticeably as tread depth approaches 3mm
- Occasional reports of sidewall durability issues or blowouts
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires on BMW and Mini models reported significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Drivers of high-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., BMW 330ci, Jaguar XJ) noted the tire handles power well but can be sensitive to inflation pressure to maintain optimal handling.
- Some users on heavier vehicles or those with aggressive driving styles reported faster-than-expected tread wear.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 | B · Kumho Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Max Performance Summer tire | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
Hankook
78
/ 100
Kumho
Too close to call: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 and Kumho Ecsta KU39 are within 2 points overall. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 is stronger on wet.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 84 vs 78 on wet.
Tire A · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta KU39
More comparisons
Also compared with
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 also compared with
Kumho Ecsta KU39 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.