79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
80/100
17 professional tests
User signal (40%)
84/100
72 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport vs Kumho Ecsta KU39 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
78
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
125 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and Kumho Ecsta KU39 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport is stronger on handling and wet. Kumho Ecsta KU39 is stronger on comfort.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 SuperSport leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 95 | 86 |
| SimpleTire owners | 100 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 SuperSport leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 80 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 78 |
| SimpleTire owners | 100 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU39 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 60 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 74 | 81 |
| SimpleTire owners | 80 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 87 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | 100 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Ecsta KU39 leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 73 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Eagle F1 SuperSport leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Eagle F1 SuperSport | Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 76 |
| DriverReviews owners | 86 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | Kumho Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 78 |
| Dry | 88 | 86 |
| Wet | 81 | 78 |
| Comfort | 67 | 81 |
| Noise | 87 | – |
| Treadwear | 72 | 73 |
| Handling | 91 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Tire A
78
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport is widely regarded as a high-performance, track-capable tire that offers exceptional dry grip, precise steering feedback, and excellent value compared to premium competitors like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. While it excels in spirited driving and handling, some users report a firmer ride, increased road noise, and inconsistent performance in cold or damp conditions, with tread wear varying significantly based on vehicle torque and driving style.
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- Direct and communicative steering feedback
- Strong value proposition compared to Michelin and Continental alternatives
- Impressive wet weather performance for a UUHP tire
- Robust sidewall construction providing high-speed stability
Cons
- Increased road noise and NVH compared to comfort-oriented tires
- Performance drop-off in cold temperatures or damp conditions
- Tread wear can be rapid on high-torque or track-heavy applications
- Stiffer ride quality may be perceived as harsh on poor road surfaces
- Occasional reports of overnight flat-spotting
Observations
- Users with high-torque FWD hot hatches noted excellent traction off the line but reported faster front-tire wear.
- Drivers switching from factory run-flat tires consistently reported significant improvements in comfort, steering feel, and overall grip.
- Performance varies by manufacturer-specific OE markings (e.g., Audi vs. BMW spec), with some users noting differences in sidewall stiffness and compound behavior.
The Kumho Ecsta KU39 is widely regarded as a high-value, mid-range performance tire that offers a compelling alternative to premium brands. Users consistently praise its excellent dry and wet grip, comfort, and low noise levels, often noting that it outperforms more expensive tires while significantly reducing road noise and harshness. While most users are satisfied with the performance, some report concerns regarding tread longevity and a soft sidewall that can impact handling precision during aggressive cornering.
Pros
- Exceptional value for money compared to premium competitors
- Strong wet and dry traction
- Outstanding ride comfort and low road noise
- Progressive and predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Soft sidewalls can lead to a lack of steering sharpness or 'squirm' under heavy load
- Performance can drop off noticeably as tread depth approaches 3mm
- Occasional reports of sidewall durability issues or blowouts
Observations
- Users transitioning from run-flat tires on BMW and Mini models reported significant improvements in ride comfort and noise reduction.
- Drivers of high-horsepower, rear-wheel-drive vehicles (e.g., BMW 330ci, Jaguar XJ) noted the tire handles power well but can be sensitive to inflation pressure to maintain optimal handling.
- Some users on heavier vehicles or those with aggressive driving styles reported faster-than-expected tread wear.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | B · Kumho Ecsta KU39 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Max Performance tires | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 19 | — |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 23″ | — |
| Tread depth | 7 - 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 080 - 300 A - AA A | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
Goodyear
78
/ 100
Kumho
Too close to call: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport and Kumho Ecsta KU39 are within 2 points overall. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport is stronger on handling and wet. Kumho Ecsta KU39 is stronger on comfort.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 91 vs 76 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Ecsta KU39 scores 81 vs 67 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scores 81 vs 78 on wet.
Tire A · Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta KU39
More comparisons
Also compared with
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport also compared with
Kumho Ecsta KU39 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.