Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Firestone Firehawk AS vs Kumho Ecsta STX KL12 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk AS | Ecsta STX KL12 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 97 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk AS | Ecsta STX KL12 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 47 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 90 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk AS | Ecsta STX KL12 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 45 | – |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk AS | Ecsta STX KL12 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 80 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 92 |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk AS | Ecsta STX KL12 |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleTire owners | – | 92 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk AS | Ecsta STX KL12 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 70 |
| SimpleTire owners | – | 87 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | Firehawk AS | Ecsta STX KL12 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 70 | 60 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Firestone Firehawk AS | Kumho Ecsta STX KL12 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 87 | 83 |
| Dry | 94 | 91 |
| Wet | 87 | 81 |
| Snow | 79 | 87 |
| Comfort | 94 | 89 |
| Noise | 90 | 92 |
| Treadwear | 92 | 83 |
| Handling | 70 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Firestone FireHawk AS is generally regarded as a high-value, sporty all-season tire that offers impressive dry grip and handling characteristics. While many users praise its longevity and aesthetic appeal, there is a notable divide regarding its wet-weather performance, with some users reporting significant concerns regarding hydroplaning.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Strong dry traction and cornering stability
- Attractive aesthetic design
- High value-to-price ratio
- Responsive steering feedback and sidewall stiffness
Cons
- Significant concerns regarding hydroplaning in heavy rain
- Potential for tread cracking after extended high-mileage use
- Availability issues at local retail outlets
Observations
- Owners of RWD performance vehicles like the Ford Mustang and Infiniti G35 report high satisfaction with cornering and handling.
- The tire demonstrates robust durability on high-torque FWD vehicles, effectively resisting belt shifting compared to other brands.
- Drivers of heavy, body-on-frame sedans appreciate the increased sidewall stiffness for improved steering feedback.
The Kumho Ecsta STX KL12 is widely regarded as a high-value tire that offers impressive longevity and reliable grip for the price point. While most users report high satisfaction with its performance and durability, a minority of drivers have experienced issues with traction, particularly on specific luxury SUV platforms.
Pros
- Excellent price-to-performance ratio
- High tread life and durability
- Strong wet weather grip and cornering stability
- Deep initial tread depth
Cons
- Potential for increased road noise over time
- Inconsistent traction performance on certain vehicle chassis
- Accelerated wear on poor road surfaces
Observations
- Users driving the BMW X3 reported significant traction issues, suggesting the tire may not be well-suited for the handling characteristics of certain performance-oriented SUVs.
- Drivers report high mileage longevity, with some users claiming up to 75,000 miles of service.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Firestone Firehawk AS | B · Kumho Ecsta STX KL12 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season High Performance tires | Summer High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 4 | 7 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 18″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 11.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 480 A A | 420 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | 50 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Firestone
Kumho
Winner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better handling, treadwear and wet. Pick the Kumho Ecsta STX KL12 if snow matters most to you.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 60 on handling.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 92 vs 83 on treadwear.
Kumho Ecsta STX KL12 scores 87 vs 79 on snow.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 87 vs 81 on wet.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.