Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho Road Venture 798 vs Nitto NT 01 — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Road Venture 798

All Season Touring tires

Kumho Road Venture 798 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
71 owner reviews
Dry
95
Wet
89
Snow
92
Comfort
92
Noise
92
Treadwear
92
Handling
89

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Nitto NT 01 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
9 owner reviews
Dry
94
Wet
46
Snow
–
Comfort
46
Noise
–
Treadwear
73
Handling
83

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture 798 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture 798 leads by 1
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
95
B — Nitto NT 01
94
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture 798NT 01
Tyre Reviews owners 75 94

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture 798 leads by 43
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
89
B — Nitto NT 01
46
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture 798NT 01
Tyre Reviews owners 63 46

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
92
B — Nitto NT 01
–

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture 798 leads by 46
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
92
B — Nitto NT 01
46
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture 798NT 01
Tyre Reviews owners 70 46

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
92
B — Nitto NT 01
–

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Road Venture 798 leads by 19
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
92
B — Nitto NT 01
73
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture 798NT 01
Tyre Reviews owners 85 73

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Road Venture 798 leads by 6
A — Kumho Road Venture 798
89
B — Nitto NT 01
83
Why this score
SourceRoad Venture 798NT 01
Tyre Reviews owners 53 83

Scores at a glance

Kumho Road Venture 798 vs Nitto NT 01: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Road Venture 798Nitto NT 01
Relative Score 91 66
Dry 95 94
Wet 89 46
Snow 92 –
Comfort 92 46
Noise 92 –
Treadwear 92 73
Handling 89 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Road Venture 798

The Kumho Road Venture 798 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-terrain tire that punches above its price point, particularly regarding road noise and ride comfort. While most users praise its performance across various surfaces, including snow and light off-road terrain, a minority of owners report issues with ride quality and uneven wear patterns.

Pros

  • Exceptional value for the price point
  • Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain/aggressive tread design
  • Strong dry pavement traction and handling
  • Good longevity and tread wear performance for many users
  • Aesthetically pleasing, aggressive sidewall design

Cons

  • Reports of uneven wear or cupping over time
  • Some users experience vibration or bouncing issues on heavier trucks
  • Wet weather traction can be inconsistent depending on road surface
  • Occasional reports of slow air pressure loss

Observations

  • Owners of heavy-duty trucks (e.g., RAM 2500) reported more significant ride quality issues, such as shaking or bouncing, compared to SUV owners.
  • Users on smaller SUVs and crossovers (e.g., Hyundai Santa Fe) frequently report high satisfaction with longevity and comfort, often comparing them favorably to premium brands like Michelin.
  • The tire is noted for being a quiet alternative to more aggressive mud-terrain tires on vehicles like the Jeep Wrangler and FJ Cruiser.
Tire B Nitto NT 01

The Nitto NT01 is widely regarded as a high-value, track-focused semi-slick tire that excels in dry conditions, offering impressive longevity compared to its competitors. While it provides exceptional grip and consistent performance for track enthusiasts, users must exercise extreme caution in wet conditions due to a significant risk of hydroplaning.

Pros

  • Exceptional dry traction and grip levels
  • Outstanding tread life and durability for a track-oriented tire
  • Quick warm-up times, even on heavier vehicles
  • High value-for-money proposition for track day participants

Cons

  • Severe hydroplaning risk in standing water or heavy rain
  • High levels of road noise
  • Poor traction on painted road markings, especially when wet
  • Limited communication/feedback compared to top-tier racing slicks

Observations

  • Lightweight FWD vehicles, such as modified MINIs, benefit from rapid heat-up and high confidence during hillclimbs and circuit use.
  • Heavy, high-torque vehicles (approx. 2 tons) report that the tires handle power well, though they may experience heat saturation after 6-7 consecutive laps.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Road Venture 798 B · Nitto NT 01
CategoryAll Season Touring tires—
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4—
Sizes available—17
Rim diameters—14″ – 19″
Tread depth—6.3/32″
UTQG—100 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Nitto

Winner: Kumho Road Venture 798 — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 92 vs 46 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 89 vs 46 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 92 vs 73 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 89 vs 83 on handling.

Tire A · Kumho Road Venture 798
Tire B · Nitto NT 01

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.