72
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
69/100
7 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 vs Kumho Road Venture 798 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
91
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
91/100
71 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Kumho Road Venture 798 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 11
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 75 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 25
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 60 | 63 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 31
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 70 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Road Venture 798 leads by 39
Why this score
| Source | A/T KO2 | Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 53 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | Kumho Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 91 |
| Dry | 84 | 95 |
| Wet | 64 | 89 |
| Snow | 92 | 92 |
| Comfort | 61 | 92 |
| Noise | – | 92 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 92 |
| Handling | 50 | 89 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
Tire A
91
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich A/T KO2 is widely regarded as a highly durable and aesthetically aggressive tire that excels in off-road environments and extreme heat. While users praise its longevity and rugged construction, there is a clear consensus regarding its compromises in on-road comfort, noise levels, and wet-weather performance.
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability even in extreme temperatures
- Strong off-road traction across varied terrain including rocks, mud, and sand
- Aggressive, iconic visual appeal
- Reliable performance when aired down for off-road use
Cons
- Noticeable road noise during daily driving
- Subpar handling and traction in wet on-road conditions
- Reduced ride comfort compared to less aggressive all-terrain options
Observations
- Owners of smaller, lightweight 4x4s like the Suzuki Jimny report surprisingly good road-holding characteristics.
- The tire demonstrates extreme heat resistance, maintaining structural integrity after years of use in desert climates exceeding 50°C.
The Kumho Road Venture 798 is widely regarded as a high-value, all-terrain tire that punches above its price point, particularly regarding road noise and ride comfort. While most users praise its performance across various surfaces, including snow and light off-road terrain, a minority of owners report issues with ride quality and uneven wear patterns.
Pros
- Exceptional value for the price point
- Surprisingly low road noise for an all-terrain/aggressive tread design
- Strong dry pavement traction and handling
- Good longevity and tread wear performance for many users
- Aesthetically pleasing, aggressive sidewall design
Cons
- Reports of uneven wear or cupping over time
- Some users experience vibration or bouncing issues on heavier trucks
- Wet weather traction can be inconsistent depending on road surface
- Occasional reports of slow air pressure loss
Observations
- Owners of heavy-duty trucks (e.g., RAM 2500) reported more significant ride quality issues, such as shaking or bouncing, compared to SUV owners.
- Users on smaller SUVs and crossovers (e.g., Hyundai Santa Fe) frequently report high satisfaction with longevity and comfort, often comparing them favorably to premium brands like Michelin.
- The tire is noted for being a quiet alternative to more aggressive mud-terrain tires on vehicles like the Jeep Wrangler and FJ Cruiser.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2 | B · Kumho Road Venture 798 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season All Terrain and Off Road tires | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | — | SUV and 4x4 |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
BFGoodrich
91
/ 100
Kumho
Winner: Kumho Road Venture 798 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 89 vs 50 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 92 vs 61 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 89 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Kumho Road Venture 798 scores 92 vs 80 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich A/T KO2
Tire B · Kumho Road Venture 798
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich A/T KO2 also compared with
Kumho Road Venture 798 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.