Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 vs Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
6 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | 86 |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 78 | 89 |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 80 |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 88 |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 83 |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | WinterCraft WP72 | Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 78 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Kumho WinterCraft WP72 | Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 84 |
| Dry | 82 | 86 |
| Wet | 78 | 89 |
| Snow | 86 | 80 |
| Comfort | 77 | 88 |
| Treadwear | 80 | 83 |
| Handling | 71 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Kumho WinterCraft WP72 is widely regarded as a high-value performance winter tire that balances dry and wet road handling with competent snow traction. While most users praise its comfort, low noise levels, and affordability compared to premium alternatives, some report concerns regarding high-speed stability and potential issues with tire uniformity.
Pros
- Excellent value for money compared to premium winter tire brands
- Impressive noise suppression and ride comfort
- Strong performance on dry and wet surfaces
- Reliable traction in typical winter snow and slush conditions
Cons
- Vague handling and stability at higher highway speeds
- Reports of soft sidewalls leading to a 'jelly' feel
- Potential for flat-spotting and balancing issues
- Diminishing snow grip as the tread wears down
Observations
- Users with heavy EVs and RWD vehicles report good snow traction, though some note minor slippage during aggressive cornering on wet surfaces.
- Performance-oriented vehicles like the Subaru BRZ and Tesla Model 3 find the tire to be a capable, budget-friendly alternative to extreme winter tires.
The Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme is widely regarded by users as a high-performance winter tire that excels in deep snow, ice, and cold, wet conditions. While it offers exceptional traction and safety margins in harsh weather, users note that its performance degrades in warmer temperatures, where the compound becomes soft and handling feels less precise.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and stability in deep snow and on ice
- Strong performance in cold, wet, and greasy road conditions
- Impressive tread longevity and durability
- High value-for-money compared to premium competitors
- Noticeable improvement in handling and confidence over standard summer or all-season tires
Cons
- Reduced handling precision and 'squidgy' feel in temperatures above 13°C
- Initial stiffness or harsh ride quality during the break-in period
- Increased tread wear if used consistently in warm summer weather
- Less effective on clay-based mud when tread depth drops below 4mm
Observations
- Owners of heavy SUVs and 4x4s (e.g., Land Rover Freelander, Volvo XC90) frequently report that these tires transform vehicle capability in extreme winter conditions.
- Users noted that the tires significantly improved the handling of rear-wheel-drive vehicles, which are typically prone to losing traction in cold weather.
- Some users reported a harsh ride initially on larger wheel sizes, which improved significantly after a break-in period of approximately 2,000 miles.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Kumho WinterCraft WP72 | B · Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Premium Touring tires | Winter High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Kumho
Vredestein
Winner: Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme — better wet, comfort and handling. Pick the Kumho WinterCraft WP72 if snow matters most to you.
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme scores 89 vs 78 on wet.
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme scores 88 vs 77 on comfort.
Vredestein Wintrac 4 Extreme scores 78 vs 71 on handling.
Kumho WinterCraft WP72 scores 86 vs 80 on snow.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.