83
/ 100
Objective (60%)
93/100
29 professional tests
User signal (40%)
87/100
28 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P vs Laufenn I Fit+ — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
84
/ 100
Objective (60%)
78/100
7 professional tests
User signal (40%)
92/100
8 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictToo close to call: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Laufenn I Fit+ are within 2 points overall. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is stronger on wet and noise. Laufenn I Fit+ is stronger on snow, comfort and treadwear.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
I Fit+ leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 90 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 88 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 98% | 94% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 98% | 97% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 83 | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 91 | 93 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 100% | 74% |
| Wet Circle (% of best) | 99% | 96% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 99% | 95% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
I Fit+ leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 100 |
| Snow Braking (% of best) | 98% | 95% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) | 99% | 97% |
| Snow Slalom (% of best) | 98% | 98% |
| Snow Traction (% of best) | 95% | 81% |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
I Fit+ leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 82 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 90 | 90 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
WinterContact TS 870 P leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 59 | 41 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
I Fit+ leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 89 | 83 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
I Fit+ leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | WinterContact TS 870 P | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 88 | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | Laufenn I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 83 | 84 |
| Dry | 89 | 90 |
| Wet | 86 | 81 |
| Snow | 82 | 87 |
| Comfort | 85 | 88 |
| Noise | 59 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 89 | 92 |
| Handling | 88 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
83
/ 100
Tire A
84
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #2/16 · 2024 ADAC 17 inch Winter Tyre Test | 94% #10/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +3.7 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #7/9 · 2022 Sports Car UHP Winter Tyre Test | 97% #18/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +1 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 100% #1/11 · 2023 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 82% #15/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | +18.4 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 95% #3/11 · 2023 Sports Cars Winter Tyre Test | 94% #4/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | +0.6 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 88% #7/9 · 2021 Tyre Reviews Winter Tyre Test | 71% #3/20 · 2021 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +16.2 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 100% #20/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 64% #1/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | +35.8 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 73% #17/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 93% #2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | -19.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 50% #2/10 · 2024 AS SUV Winter Tyre Test | 2% #47/45 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | +47.9 | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 98% #5/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | 95% #10/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +2.5 | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 99% #7/10 · 2024 All Season and Winter Tyre Test | 97% #14/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | +1.9 | Different tests |
| Snow Slalom | Snow | 98% #3/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test | 98% #4/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +0.4 | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 95% #7/10 · 2024 Auto Bild Sportscars Winter Tyre Test | 81% #17/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | +13.9 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 98% #3/7 · 2023 AMS SUV Winter Tyre Test | 93% #16/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | +4.8 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #14/20 · 2022 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 0% #3/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #8/9 · 2023 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test | 74% #44/44 · 2019 Winter Tyre Test Market Overview | +25.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 99% #3/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | 96% #13/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +2.7 | Same test |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 99% #4/11 · 2025 Autobild SUV Winter Tyre Test | 95% #13/20 · 2023 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test | +4.7 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is widely regarded as a premium, highly balanced winter tire that excels in wet and slushy conditions while offering exceptional comfort and low noise levels. Most users report high levels of confidence in varied winter weather, though a small minority of users report inconsistent performance in severe snow and ice, and some note that steering response is less sharp than dedicated performance-focused alternatives.
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- High levels of cabin comfort and low road noise
- Strong, predictable grip on snow and slush
- Good balance of dry handling and rolling resistance
- Solid tread life and durability for a performance winter tire
Cons
- Premium price point compared to competitors
- Steering feel can be perceived as 'soft' or 'jelly' compared to summer tires
- Performance can drop off in temperatures above 8-10°C
- Inconsistent feedback regarding extreme ice traction
Observations
- EV and hybrid owners frequently praise the tire for its low rolling resistance and quiet operation.
- Drivers of high-performance RWD vehicles report that while the tire provides excellent grip, it may feel less stiff and sharp during aggressive cornering compared to summer counterparts.
- Users on larger wheel diameters (20-inch) report that the tire maintains high comfort levels without sacrificing handling.
The Laufenn I Fit+ is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that punches well above its price point, offering impressive traction on snow and ice. While most users praise its performance in severe winter conditions, some note minor limitations regarding water and slush evacuation.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip on snow and ice
- Outstanding price-to-quality ratio
- Reliable performance in freezing rain and slushy conditions
- Competent handling on dry and wet road surfaces
Cons
- Potential difficulty with water evacuation in heavy standing water
- Performance on deep slush is slightly less refined than on packed snow
- Limited long-term tread wear data available from early-stage users
Observations
- Users operating smaller sedans, such as the VW Jetta, report high confidence on steep, snow-covered inclines.
- BMW 3-series owners noted that the tire serves as a highly capable, cost-effective alternative to premium-brand winter tires.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P | B · Laufenn I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Winter Ultra High Performance tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
83
/ 100
Continental
84
/ 100
Laufenn
Too close to call: Continental WinterContact TS 870 P and Laufenn I Fit+ are within 2 points overall. Continental WinterContact TS 870 P is stronger on wet and noise. Laufenn I Fit+ is stronger on snow, comfort and treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 86 vs 81 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P scores 59 vs 54 on noise.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Laufenn I Fit+ scores 87 vs 82 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn I Fit+ scores 88 vs 85 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental WinterContact TS 870 P
Tire B · Laufenn I Fit+
More comparisons
Also compared with
Continental WinterContact TS 870 P also compared with
Laufenn I Fit+ also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.