Skip to content
Winter tire Winter Premium Touring tires Updated September 2026

Laufenn I Fit+ review

The Laufenn I Fit+ is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that punches well above its price point, offering impressive traction on snow and ice. While most users praise its performance in severe winter conditions, some note minor limitations regarding water and slush evacuation.

Relative score
84/100
tests + owners
Owner reviews
92/100
8 reviews
Road tests
78/100
11 published tests

Owners rate it 13.6 points higher than the instrumented road tests do — see the two score breakdowns below for where they disagree.

Laufenn I Fit+
Scores

Two scoring systems, side by side

Owner scores come from reviews on retailer and review sites; road-test scores come from instrumented tests. Where they disagree, it is usually a discipline owners rarely push to the limit.

By owner reviews

91.8%
Would buy again 95%
Dry
Overall dry
94%
Wet
Overall wet
96.5%
Snow & ice
Overall snow & ice
100%
Comfort
Overall comfort
87.5%
Noise
Overall noise
75%
Treadwear
Overall treadwear
91.5%
Handling
Overall handling
90%

By road tests

78.2%
Dry
86.6%
Wet
71.1%
Snow
77.8%
Noise
40.6%
By discipline (% of best in test)
Dry Braking
85%
Dry Handling
15%
Subj. Dry Handling
87.5%
Wet Braking
10%
Wet Handling
10%
Straight Aquaplaning
25%
Curved Aquaplaning
37.5%
Side G-Force on Wet surface
37.5%
Snow Braking
70%
Snow Handling
35%
Snow Traction
20%
Ice Braking
93.8%
Ice Handling
93.8%
Inside Noise level
85%
Outside Noise
68.8%
Rolling Resistance
30%
Price
100%
Wear
95%
From owners

What owners like and dislike

Themes extracted from 8 owner reviews across retailers and review sites.

The Laufenn I Fit+ is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that punches well above its price point, offering impressive traction on snow and ice. While most users praise its performance in severe winter conditions, some note minor limitations regarding water and slush evacuation.

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and grip on snow and ice
  • Outstanding price-to-quality ratio
  • Reliable performance in freezing rain and slushy conditions
  • Competent handling on dry and wet road surfaces

Cons

  • Potential difficulty with water evacuation in heavy standing water
  • Performance on deep slush is slightly less refined than on packed snow
  • Limited long-term tread wear data available from early-stage users

Worth knowing

  • Users operating smaller sedans, such as the VW Jetta, report high confidence on steep, snow-covered inclines.
  • BMW 3-series owners noted that the tire serves as a highly capable, cost-effective alternative to premium-brand winter tires.
Test results

11 published test appearances

Placement within each field. Open a test for the discipline-by-discipline result.

2024 Winter 55 tire Braking Test · 205/55 R16

38th of 55
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking38th of 55

2023 Auto Bild Winter tire Test · 225/45 R18

13th of 20
Best: Rolling Resistance · 4th Weakest: Straight Aqua · 19th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking9th of 20
Wet Handling13th of 20
Wet Circle13th of 20
Dry Braking10th of 20
Dry Handling18th of 20
Snow Braking10th of 20
Snow Traction7th of 20
Snow Handling9th of 20
Rolling Resistance4th of 20
Straight Aqua19th of 20
Noise8th of 20
Value8th of 20
Wear17th of 20
Snow Slalom4th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership7th of 20

2023 Winter tire Test 54 Set Braking Test · 225/45 R18

10th of 54
Best: Wet Braking · 8th Weakest: Snow Braking · 10th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking8th of 54
Snow Braking10th of 54

2021 Auto Bild Winter tire Test · 205/55 R16

20th of 20
Best: Snow Handling · 2nd Weakest: Straight Aqua · 20th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking9th of 20
Wet Handling16th of 20
Dry Braking4th of 20
Dry Handling3rd of 20
Snow Braking11th of 20
Snow Traction7th of 20
Snow Handling2nd of 20
Rolling Resistance8th of 20
Straight Aqua20th of 20
Noise12th of 20
Value11th of 20
Price3rd of 20
Wear17th of 20
Total Cost of Ownership8th of 20

2021 ADAC 15 Inch Winter tire Test · 225/50 R17

9th of 16
DisciplinePlacementField position

2021 Winter tire Market Overview · 205/55 R16

10th of 49
Best: Wet Braking · 9th Weakest: Snow Braking · 11th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking9th of 49
Snow Braking11th of 49

2020 Auto Bild Performance Winter tire Test · 245/45 R18

16th of 20
Best: Value · 1st Weakest: Wet Braking · 19th
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking19th of 20
Wet Handling19th of 20
Dry Braking4th of 20
Dry Handling18th of 20
Snow Braking7th of 20
Snow Traction17th of 20
Snow Handling14th of 20
Rolling Resistance15th of 20
Straight Aqua16th of 20
Noise4th of 20
Value1st of 20
Wear2nd of 20
Total Cost of Ownership3rd of 20

2020 Winter tire Market Overview - 52 tire Braking Test · 245/45 R18

19th of 48
Best: Snow Braking · 8th Weakest: Wet Braking · 23rd
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking23rd of 48
Snow Braking8th of 48

2019 Winter tire Test Market Overview · 225/45 R17

47th of 45
DisciplinePlacementField position
Wet Braking44th of 45

2018 ADAC Winter tire Test - 205/55 R16 · 205/55 R16

16th of 16
DisciplinePlacementField position

2018 51 Winter tire Shootout · 195/65 R15

43rd of 51
DisciplinePlacementField position
Head-to-head

Laufenn I Fit+ compared

Compare any two