Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX vs Laufenn I Fit+ — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 79 | 88 |
| SimpleTire owners | 91 | – |
Wet
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 71 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 93 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Snow
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 54 | 100 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Comfort
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 90 |
| SimpleTire owners | 94 | – |
Noise
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | 41 |
| SimpleTire owners | 90 | – |
Treadwear
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 83 |
| SimpleTire owners | 87 | – |
Handling
Why this score
| Source | ContiCrossContact LX | I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 62 | 90 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiCrossContact LX | Laufenn I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 84 |
| Dry | 83 | 90 |
| Wet | 73 | 81 |
| Snow | 64 | 87 |
| Comfort | 76 | 88 |
| Noise | 90 | 54 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 92 |
| Handling | 62 | 90 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Tire A
Tire B
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Continental ContiCrossContact LX receives highly polarized feedback, often serving as a polarizing factory-fitted OEM tire. While some users praise its dry-road handling, quiet ride, and value, a significant portion of owners report severe dissatisfaction regarding wet-weather traction, hydroplaning, and inconsistent tread life.
Pros
- Strong dry-road grip and handling performance
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality on pavement
- Competitive price point compared to premium alternatives
- Good initial feedback and steering response
Cons
- Poor wet-weather performance, including hydroplaning and sliding
- Inconsistent and often premature tread wear
- Susceptibility to uneven wear patterns
- Lack of confidence in winter or slushy conditions
Observations
- Owners of modern SUVs like the Volvo XC60 and Jeep Cherokee frequently report dissatisfaction with the tire's longevity and wet-weather safety when fitted as OEM equipment.
- Long-term durability appears highly variable, with some users reporting 60,000km+ of life while others experience failure or significant wear before 20,000 miles.
The Laufenn I Fit+ is widely regarded as a high-value winter tire that punches well above its price point, offering impressive traction on snow and ice. While most users praise its performance in severe winter conditions, some note minor limitations regarding water and slush evacuation.
Pros
- Exceptional traction and grip on snow and ice
- Outstanding price-to-quality ratio
- Reliable performance in freezing rain and slushy conditions
- Competent handling on dry and wet road surfaces
Cons
- Potential difficulty with water evacuation in heavy standing water
- Performance on deep slush is slightly less refined than on packed snow
- Limited long-term tread wear data available from early-stage users
Observations
- Users operating smaller sedans, such as the VW Jetta, report high confidence on steep, snow-covered inclines.
- BMW 3-series owners noted that the tire serves as a highly capable, cost-effective alternative to premium-brand winter tires.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiCrossContact LX | B · Laufenn I Fit+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Winter Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 18″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 680 A B | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental
Laufenn
Winner: Laufenn I Fit+ — better handling, treadwear and snow. Pick the Continental ContiCrossContact LX if noise matters most to you.
Continental ContiCrossContact LX scores 90 vs 54 on noise.
Laufenn I Fit+ scores 90 vs 62 on handling.
Laufenn I Fit+ scores 92 vs 66 on treadwear.
Laufenn I Fit+ scores 87 vs 64 on snow.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.