Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated September 2026

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared (September 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Kumho Crugen HT51 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
76/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
71/100
3 owner reviews
Dry
85
Wet
87
Snow
78
Comfort
83
Noise
87
Treadwear
73
Handling
77

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Laufenn

Laufenn S FIT AS

All Season Ultra High Performance tires

Laufenn S FIT AS tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
35 owner reviews
Dry
92
Wet
82
Snow
60
Comfort
88
Noise
90
Treadwear
85
Handling
76

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Kumho Crugen HT51 and Laufenn S FIT AS are within 2 points overall. Kumho Crugen HT51 is stronger on snow and wet. Laufenn S FIT AS is stronger on treadwear, dry and comfort.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) S FIT AS leads by 7
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
85
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
92
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51S FIT AS
Professional tests (TWG score) 88 –
Tire Rack owners 89 87
Tyre Reviews owners 80 83
SimpleTire owners 97 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 5
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
87
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
82
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51S FIT AS
Professional tests (TWG score) 92 –
Tire Rack owners 81 79
Tyre Reviews owners 80 66
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 18
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
78
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
60
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51S FIT AS
Professional tests (TWG score) 91 –
Tire Rack owners 91 66
Tyre Reviews owners 60 10
SimpleTire owners 92 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) S FIT AS leads by 5
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
83
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
88
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51S FIT AS
Professional tests (TWG score) 94 –
Tire Rack owners 83 82
Tyre Reviews owners 67 84
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) S FIT AS leads by 3
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
87
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
90
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51S FIT AS
Professional tests (TWG score) 87 –
SimpleTire owners 94 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) S FIT AS leads by 12
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
73
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
85
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51S FIT AS
Tire Rack owners 87 80
Tyre Reviews owners 73 72
SimpleTire owners 95 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Crugen HT51 leads by 1
A — Kumho Crugen HT51
77
B — Laufenn S FIT AS
76
Why this score
SourceCrugen HT51S FIT AS
Tyre Reviews owners 77 76

Scores at a glance

Kumho Crugen HT51 vs Laufenn S FIT AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Crugen HT51Laufenn S FIT AS
Relative Score 81 82
Dry 85 92
Wet 87 82
Snow 78 60
Comfort 83 88
Noise 87 90
Treadwear 73 85
Handling 77 76

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Crugen HT51

The Kumho Crugen H/T51 is widely regarded as a high-value, versatile highway tire that offers impressive wet and dry traction comparable to premium competitors. While users appreciate its fuel efficiency and handling characteristics, long-term ownership experiences are polarized by reports of uneven tread wear and significant noise degradation over time.

Pros

  • Excellent wet and dry weather traction
  • High value-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
  • Positive impact on fuel economy
  • Quiet highway performance during early stages of ownership

Cons

  • Significant increase in road noise as the tire ages
  • Premature or uneven shoulder wear
  • Limited capability in deep mud or severe winter conditions
  • Noise levels becoming intrusive between 45-55 mph

Observations

  • Users operating heavy-duty trucks like the Ram 1500 report stable handling and good wet-weather confidence.
  • Owners of SUVs like the 4Runner note that while the tire performs well for highway and light off-road use, it is susceptible to shoulder wear patterns.
Tire B Laufenn S FIT AS

The Laufenn S Fit AS is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that delivers impressive comfort and low road noise, often outperforming its price point. While most users praise its dry-weather handling and ride quality, there is a notable consensus regarding its limitations in wet-weather traction and potential concerns regarding long-term sidewall durability.

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong dry-weather grip and handling
  • Easy to balance and install

Cons

  • Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction
  • Reports of premature sidewall issues or blowouts
  • Tread life may be shorter than premium alternatives
  • Performance can degrade significantly as the tire wears

Observations

  • Users with high-torque vehicles, such as rear-wheel-drive EVs or powerful sedans, report significant traction loss in wet conditions.
  • Drivers on larger wheel diameters (19-inch+) noted that while the tire is quiet, road noise is still perceptible due to the lower profile nature of the fitment.
  • Some users on rougher road surfaces reported faster tread wear and sidewall vulnerability.
Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Crugen HT51 B · Laufenn S FIT AS
Category—All Season Ultra High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available44—
Rim diameters15″ – 22″—
Tread depth12.5/32″—
UTQG720 A A—
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Laufenn

Too close to call: Kumho Crugen HT51 and Laufenn S FIT AS are within 2 points overall. Kumho Crugen HT51 is stronger on snow and wet. Laufenn S FIT AS is stronger on treadwear, dry and comfort.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 78 vs 60 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 85 vs 73 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Laufenn S FIT AS scores 92 vs 85 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Crugen HT51 scores 87 vs 82 on wet.

Tire A · Kumho Crugen HT51
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.