76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Laufenn G FIT AS vs Laufenn S FIT AS — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
79/100
35 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better treadwear, wet and dry. Pick the Laufenn G FIT AS if snow matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
S FIT AS leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | G FIT AS | S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 88 | 87 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 81 | 83 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
S FIT AS leads by 10
Why this score
| Source | G FIT AS | S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 78 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 65 | 66 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | G FIT AS | S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 67 | 66 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 54 | 10 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
S FIT AS leads by 3
Why this score
| Source | G FIT AS | S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | 82 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 84 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 1
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
S FIT AS leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | G FIT AS | S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 81 | 80 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 61 | 72 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | G FIT AS | S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 77 | 76 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn G FIT AS | Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 82 |
| Dry | 86 | 92 |
| Wet | 72 | 82 |
| Snow | 67 | 60 |
| Comfort | 85 | 88 |
| Noise | 91 | 90 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 85 |
| Handling | 77 | 76 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Tire A
82
/ 100
Tire B
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Laufenn G Fit AS is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, entry-level tire that excels in ride comfort and noise reduction for daily commuting. While many users appreciate the value proposition, there is a significant divide regarding wet-weather performance and long-term tread longevity, with some users reporting premature wear and poor traction in rain.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good dry weather handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for some users
Cons
- Poor traction and grip in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life failing to meet mileage expectations
- Concerns regarding overall build quality and durability
- Average handling characteristics
Observations
- Users driving smaller, lower-powered vehicles reported significant wheel spin in wet conditions, suggesting limited grip for acceleration.
- Repeat customers noted the tire performs reliably on a variety of mid-sized sedans and crossovers like the Toyota Venza, Camry, and Elantra, provided expectations are set for a budget tire.
The Laufenn S Fit AS is widely regarded as a high-value budget tire that delivers impressive comfort and low road noise, often outperforming its price point. While most users praise its dry-weather handling and ride quality, there is a notable consensus regarding its limitations in wet-weather traction and potential concerns regarding long-term sidewall durability.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong dry-weather grip and handling
- Easy to balance and install
Cons
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction
- Reports of premature sidewall issues or blowouts
- Tread life may be shorter than premium alternatives
- Performance can degrade significantly as the tire wears
Observations
- Users with high-torque vehicles, such as rear-wheel-drive EVs or powerful sedans, report significant traction loss in wet conditions.
- Drivers on larger wheel diameters (19-inch+) noted that while the tire is quiet, road noise is still perceptible due to the lower profile nature of the fitment.
- Some users on rougher road surfaces reported faster tread wear and sidewall vulnerability.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn G FIT AS | B · Laufenn S FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Touring tires | All Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Laufenn
82
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Laufenn S FIT AS — better treadwear, wet and dry. Pick the Laufenn G FIT AS if snow matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 85 vs 66 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 82 vs 72 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 67 vs 60 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S FIT AS scores 92 vs 86 on dry.
Tire A · Laufenn G FIT AS
Tire B · Laufenn S FIT AS
More comparisons
Also compared with
Laufenn G FIT AS also compared with
Laufenn S FIT AS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.