61
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
52/100
3 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A vs Laufenn G FIT AS — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
74
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
74/100
20 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Laufenn G FIT AS — better snow, comfort and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A if treadwear matters most to you.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 88 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 81 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 78 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 67 | 65 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 47
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 67 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 20 | 54 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 35
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 84 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 50 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Advantage T/A leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 81 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 75 | 61 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
G FIT AS leads by 20
Why this score
| Source | Advantage T/A | G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 57 | 77 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 61 | 74 |
| Dry | 80 | 86 |
| Wet | 67 | 72 |
| Snow | 20 | 67 |
| Comfort | 50 | 85 |
| Noise | – | 91 |
| Treadwear | 75 | 66 |
| Handling | 57 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
61
/ 100
Tire A
74
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The BFGoodrich Advantage T/A receives a polarized reception, with the user highlighting significant concerns regarding the consistency and predictability of the tire compound. While it may offer improved grip levels compared to certain entry-level alternatives, the lack of reliability across varying temperature ranges makes it a difficult recommendation for performance-oriented driving.
Pros
- Improved grip levels compared to baseline tires like the XM2
- Adequate stiffness in cold weather conditions
Cons
- Highly unpredictable compound performance
- Poor heat resistance leading to a 'mushy' feel in hot weather
- Lack of confidence-inspiring grip in cold and wet conditions
Observations
- The XL (Extra Load) variant does not mitigate the fundamental issues with the tire's compound construction.
The Laufenn G Fit AS is widely regarded as a budget-friendly, entry-level tire that excels in ride comfort and noise reduction for daily commuting. While many users appreciate the value proposition, there is a significant divide regarding wet-weather performance and long-term tread longevity, with some users reporting premature wear and poor traction in rain.
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Good dry weather handling
- Noticeable improvement in fuel efficiency for some users
Cons
- Poor traction and grip in wet conditions
- Inconsistent tread life failing to meet mileage expectations
- Concerns regarding overall build quality and durability
- Average handling characteristics
Observations
- Users driving smaller, lower-powered vehicles reported significant wheel spin in wet conditions, suggesting limited grip for acceleration.
- Repeat customers noted the tire performs reliably on a variety of mid-sized sedans and crossovers like the Toyota Venza, Camry, and Elantra, provided expectations are set for a budget tire.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A | B · Laufenn G FIT AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | High Performance All Season tire | All Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 - 680 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
61
/ 100
BFGoodrich
74
/ 100
Laufenn
Winner: Laufenn G FIT AS — better snow, comfort and handling. Pick the BFGoodrich Advantage T/A if treadwear matters most to you.
Pick tire B
You drive through snowy winters
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 67 vs 20 on snow.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 85 vs 50 on comfort.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn G FIT AS scores 77 vs 57 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A scores 75 vs 66 on treadwear.
Tire A · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A
Tire B · Laufenn G FIT AS
More comparisons
Also compared with
BFGoodrich Advantage T/A also compared with
Laufenn G FIT AS also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.