Head-to-head Updated

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ vs Continental SportContact 7 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

SportContact 7 is ahead, 81–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tire ALaufenn

S Fit EQ+

Summer

Tests 66 · 11 tests Owners 78 · 11 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)

Tests 82 · 22 tests Owners 81 · 1,560 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 7 in 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

“Michelin PS4S vs Continental SC7 Aloha! This is for all of you who are struggling to choose a tire and need some impression (not a recommendation since you need to make your own decision). I've been here often enough with the question for the best summer tires, gave some opinions here and there and told my side of things. Last time I was biased toward Contis but I'll come to that later. What you see here is a direct comparison: 1st pic on the left and 2nd and 3rd one are the Michelins, 2 years old, so two full seasons of pretty harsh driving tbh. 1st pic right and 4th and 5th one are the Contis, which I bought and mounted in mid April this year. I noticed that contis are fantastic in the first 1-2 months and then start to wear off really fast. Grip is getting worse by the week. Michelins feel a bit less grippy then contis at start but keep their level for longer and thread holds up longer. Do with this what you want but I will return to PS4S again when its time (in winter Michelin anyway) because I cant see myself paying 1/3 less for Contis to then have then last only half as long as Michelin. Oh yeah, both are 225/35/19 obviously and were brand new. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 82

    Dry

    SportContact 7 +12
    94
    Why this score
    SourceS Fit EQ+SportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score)7997
    Reviews found online8590
    Dry Braking (% of best)98%100%
    Dry Handling (% of best)99%99%
  2. 74

    Wet

    SportContact 7 +13
    87
    Why this score
    SourceS Fit EQ+SportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score)7388
    Reviews found online7586
    Wet Braking (% of best)88%100%
    Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best)90%100%
    Wet Circle (% of best)91%100%
    Wet Handling (% of best)94%98%
  3. 65

    Comfort

    SportContact 7 +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceS Fit EQ+SportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score)5961
    Reviews found online7573
  4. 73

    Noise

    S Fit EQ+ +10
    63
    Why this score
    SourceS Fit EQ+SportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score)7661
  5. 57

    Treadwear

    SportContact 7 +12
    69
    Why this score
    SourceS Fit EQ+SportContact 7
    Professional tests (TWG score)4672
    Reviews found online7365
  6. 82

    Handling

    SportContact 7 +4
    86
    Why this score
    SourceS Fit EQ+SportContact 7
    Reviews found online8286
Scores at a glance
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ vs Continental SportContact 7: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryLaufenn S Fit EQ+Continental SportContact 7
Relative Score 72 81
Dry 82 94
Wet 74 87
Comfort 65 66
Noise 73 63
Treadwear 57 69
Handling 82 86

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

S Fit EQ+

SportContact 7

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryS Fit EQ+SportContact 7ΔBoth?
Curved Aquaplaning Curved 77% #20/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 93% #5/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test −15.8 Different tests
Dry Braking Dry 98% #14/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/7 · 2024 EVO Summer Tyre Test −2.2 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 99% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 99% #2/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test +0.4 Different tests
Rolling Resistance Efficiency 85% #4/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test 97% #4/7 · 2024 Autobild Sportscars Summer TIre Test R20 −12.0 Different tests
Fuel Consumption Fuel 95% #40/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 96% #6/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −1.5 Different tests
Abrasion Other 36% #46/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 69% #4/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −33.3 Different tests
Noise Other 100% #1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 100% #5/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test 0.0 Different tests
Price Other 73% #2/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test 62% #6/10 · 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres +11.3 Different tests
Value Other 74% #10/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test 33% #15/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +41.1 Different tests
Wear Other 73% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 58% #9/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test +14.2 Different tests
Overall Ranking Overall 8% #12/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout 100% #1/3 · 2022 Auto Express UUHP Summer Tire Test R19 −91.7 Different tests
Straight Aqua Straight 96% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 98% #3/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test −1.8 Different tests
Subj. Comfort Subj 100% #5/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test 100% #1/8 · 2026 Autobild Sports Cars Summer Tyre Test 0.0 Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling Subj 96% #3/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test −4.3 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 88% #19/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test 100% #1/7 · 2024 Sports Car Tyre Test −12.0 Different tests
Wet Braking - Concrete Wet 90% #21/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/18 · 2025 ADAC Summer Tyre Test −10.4 Different tests
Wet Circle Wet 91% #8/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 100% #1/3 · Top Tire Review 2026 UUHP Tyre Test −9.3 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 94% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test 98% #4/10 · 2023 The Best Electric Vehicle Tyres VS UHP Tyres −4.3 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A S Fit EQ+

Pros

  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Strong dry and wet road grip with stable handling
  • Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance

Cons

  • Increased road noise reported by some users
  • Stiffer ride quality or firmness in colder conditions (below 10°C)
  • Concerns regarding sidewall stiffness and occasional manufacturing flaws (e.g., a hump in one tire)
All owner themes in the S Fit EQ+ review

Tire B SportContact 7

Pros

  • Phenomenal wet and dry grip with high cornering limits
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Strong braking performance and high stability at speed

Cons

  • Faster-than-average tread wear, especially with spirited driving or track use
  • Stiff sidewalls can contribute to a harsher, bumpier ride
  • Elevated road noise reported on certain road surfaces
All owner themes in the SportContact 7 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Laufenn S Fit EQ+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Continental SportContact 7

Positive

Community opinion on the Continental SportContact 7 is overwhelmingly positive regarding its exceptional grip, direct steering response, and wet weather performance, often rivaling or beating the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S. However, users frequently note trade-offs in tread life, reporting faster wear and lower initial tread depth compared to touring-oriented tires.

r/CarTalkUK ·1 upvote ·2025-12-12

“Just took the factory SC7’s off my gfs puma ST, they are super grippy, they feel even stickier than the PS4S on my car but I’d say they are less predictable at the limits and I always felt like they tramlined a bit too much and they weren’t a very comfortable tyre. Fronts have just under half their tread left after 11000 miles. Swapped em out for conti all season contact 2’s as she needs to be able to go out during any conditions and she doesn’t want to have two sets.”

r/TyreReviews ·1 upvote ·2026-05-10

“I've had PS4S and SC7 on my GR Yaris. Each at least 40k km. Grip levels; very similar, both wet and dry. Handling characteristics: PS4 slightly awkward on the limit (better after they warm up), Continental feels more progressive, like softer. The real difference is track wear. None of them should be driven on track for longer periods. 10min sessions are fine. If you go over it, Conti will dissintegrate in a few hours on track. PS4S might take almost double that the milage. I like both, so it comes to your preference considering Handling on the limit and price. I'd take Michelin if price on them is visibly less than double of Conti. Searching for new tyres now and picking beetween Pirelli PZ5 and BRIDGESTONE POTENZA SPORT EVO”

r/TyreReviews ·1 upvote ·2026-02-16

“I’ve got SC7 SSRs on my MINI JCW (250hp, with 420nm torque FWD). And after 8000 miles, I’ve got 2.6mm at the front, and 4.5mm at the rear. Both are getting close to the legal UK limit, so I’ll probably get them changed out. The tyres definitely spin when not warmed up, and almost always spin in the rain. I’m definitely going to be switching to PS4S when I need to change them.”

Top themes
#exceptional dry and wet grip#fast tread wear and longevity#steering response and handling#comparison with Michelin PS4S#ride comfort and road noise#track performance vs street use

Based on 58 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Laufenn S Fit EQ+ B · Continental SportContact 7
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—8 - 9/32″
UTQG—240 AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Laufenn S Fit EQ+

Continental SportContact 7

Winner: Continental SportContact 7 — better wet, dry and treadwear. Pick the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental SportContact 7 scores 87 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental SportContact 7 scores 94 vs 82 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Continental SportContact 7 scores 69 vs 57 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 63 on noise.

Tire A · Laufenn S Fit EQ+
Tire B · Continental SportContact 7

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

81

Leads

SportContact 7

Amazon