Tests 66 · 11 tests Owners 78 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #4 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
S Fit EQ+ leads, 72–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 19 tests Owners 59 · 3,317 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test (noise)
“Which tire should I choose? I’m currently looking for new summer tires, but this time I’m finding it surprisingly difficult to choose. My previous set were Bridgestone T005s, which honestly didn’t impress me much. On my earlier car I’ve driven on Michelin PS4S, Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3, and Pirelli (don’t remember the exact model). The Michelins were by far my favorite — excellent grip and overall a fantastic tire. The Hankooks were above average and perfectly fine, but the Pirellis were a big disappointment. This time I’m considering the following three options: • Michelin Pilot Sport 5 • Continental SportContact 7 • Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 If I hadn’t done any research, I would have gone for the Michelins without hesitation. However, after digging a bit deeper, I added the Continentals as a strong competitor, and the Kumhos because they’re significantly cheaper while still getting quite positive reviews. I drive a Cupra Formentor 2.0 AWD with around 430 hp. I never take the car to the track, but I do enjoy sporty driving and quick launches at traffic lights. Now I’m finding the final decision harder than expected. Taking both price and performance into account, which of these three would you recommend? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
82
Dry
S Fit EQ+ +676Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) 79 85 Reviews found online 85 64 Dry Braking (% of best) 93% 97% Dry Handling (% of best) 99% 99% -
74
Wet
Ventus S1 evo3 +478Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) 73 84 Reviews found online 75 69 Wet Braking (% of best) 81% 92% Wet Circle (% of best) 87% 97% Wet Handling (% of best) 94% 97% -
65
Comfort
S Fit EQ+ +164Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) 59 67 Reviews found online 75 60 -
73
Noise
S Fit EQ+ +370Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) 76 73 -
57
Treadwear
S Fit EQ+ +354Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) 46 61 Reviews found online 73 45 -
82
Handling
S Fit EQ+ +2161Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus S1 evo3 Reviews found online 82 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn S Fit EQ+ | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 68 |
| Dry | 82 | 76 |
| Wet | 74 | 78 |
| Comfort | 65 | 64 |
| Noise | 73 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 54 |
| Handling | 82 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
S Fit EQ+
68
/ 100
Ventus S1 evo3
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | S Fit EQ+ | Ventus S1 evo3 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 81% #9/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 84% #10/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | −3.4 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #8/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 97% #9/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test | −3.7 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 99% #7/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 99% #5/13 · 2023 AutoBild Sports Car Summer Tyre Test | +0.2 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 88% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 92% #4/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test | −3.2 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #4/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/9 · 2024 AZ Summer Tyre Test | −0.4 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 67% #6/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 76% #13/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −8.9 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 74% #10/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 70% #8/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | +4.0 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 62% #11/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 76% #7/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −14.3 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 17% #6/10 · 2020 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/10 · 2021 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | −83.3 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 98% #18/20 · 2025 Auto Bild Summer Performance Tyre Test | 98% #8/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | 0.0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 50% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #2/8 · 2025 Die Reifentester UHP Summer Tyre Test | −50.0 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 96% #3/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 70% #7/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test | +25.7 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #3/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 0% #11/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0.0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 81% #10/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 92% #5/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test | −10.9 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 87% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 97% #8/8 · 2024 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test | −10.2 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 94% #9/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 97% #8/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −3.0 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S Fit EQ+
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Strong dry and wet road grip with stable handling
- Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance
Cons
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Stiffer ride quality or firmness in colder conditions (below 10°C)
- Concerns regarding sidewall stiffness and occasional manufacturing flaws (e.g., a hump in one tire)
Tire B Ventus S1 evo3
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
- Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
The Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 receives mixed reviews from the community, with some users praising its solid performance, great value, and good grip compared to competitors, while others note concerns regarding longevity, stock wear, and variations in ratings across different sizes. Discussions also highlight specific variant differences, such as the K127 standard version versus the K127e Tesla-specific version.
r/Golf_R
·6 upvotes ·2026-04-29
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
r/TyreReviews
·2 upvotes ·2026-01-04
“That would tally with what this person found with the 127 variant that preceded it “Hi just for information,I asked Hankook what tread depth when new was on their Ventus S1 Evo 3 K127 tyre, the reply was 6.6 mm””
r/Volkswagen
·1 upvote ·2026-03-15
“F/S Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 235/35 R19 Hi Guys Selling a full set (4) Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 235/35 R19 summer tires, with 9/32 tread depth which is exactly the same depth when these ultra high performance tires are new. No punctures anywhere. Tires came of my 2024 VW GTI with less than 3k miles on the odometer. The production date on the tires is 3324 which means 33rd week of 2024.This translates to late August 2024. $500/obo but no shipping. Local pick up only. I am in Long Island NY. Message if interested. Read more”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Price and value#Tread wear and longevity#OEM stock performance#Size variations and ratings#Comparison with competitors
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S Fit EQ+ | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
68
/ 100
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Winner: Laufenn S Fit EQ+ — better handling, dry and noise. Pick the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 if wet matters most to you.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 82 vs 61 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 82 vs 76 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 78 vs 74 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 70 on noise.
Tire A · Laufenn S Fit EQ+
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.