Tests 66 · 11 tests Owners 78 · 11 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test (noise)
Head-to-head
Updated
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Ventus Prime 4 leads, 75–72 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 77 · 13 tests Owners 74 · 2,458 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)
“Hankook Ventus Prime 4 vs Kumho Ecsta HS52? Hey there! Went to this reddit after reading a lot of reviews on the website, a bit of a newbie in general. I have read about many models and settled on 2 possible ones due to pricing and availability in my country (not looking for any other options). In my price range and requirements I've settled on Ventus Prime 4 initially (50% cheaper than Primacy that my car came stock with), but have also seen some good stuff said about HS52. I was quite settled on the first one since it scored very well in 2022 Autobild review, but now that 2024 came out a lot of numbers are completely different (predicted tread life alone took a huge dive) and Hankook is now 4 positions lower than Kumho. To add to this, Hankook was only 10% more expensive thank Kumho in my country, but now there was a price drop and and now there is 20% price difference, so set of Kumhos comes out noticeable cheaper. Spec wise they seems very similar with some trade-offs in different departments. I'm not really looking to save as much money as possible, but with latest reviews I'm not sure if there is any improvement worth paying for. Any thoughts? Thanks. Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
82
Dry
S Fit EQ+ +280Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 79 83 Reviews found online 85 77 Dry Braking (% of best) 94% 97% Dry Handling (% of best) 98% 100% -
74
Wet
Ventus Prime 4 +377Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 73 78 Reviews found online 75 76 Wet Braking (% of best) 88% 98% Wet Braking - Concrete (% of best) 90% 77% Wet Circle (% of best) 87% 98% Wet Handling (% of best) 92% 99% -
65
Comfort
Ventus Prime 4 +671Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 59 71 Reviews found online 75 71 -
73
Noise
S Fit EQ+ +964Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 76 62 -
57
Treadwear
Ventus Prime 4 +1774Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus Prime 4 Professional tests (TWG score) 46 77 Reviews found online 73 70 -
82
Handling
S Fit EQ+ +874Why this score
Source S Fit EQ+ Ventus Prime 4 Reviews found online 82 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Laufenn S Fit EQ+ | Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 75 |
| Dry | 82 | 80 |
| Wet | 74 | 77 |
| Comfort | 65 | 71 |
| Noise | 73 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 74 |
| Handling | 82 | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
72
/ 100
S Fit EQ+
75
/ 100
Ventus Prime 4
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | S Fit EQ+ | Ventus Prime 4 | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Curved Aquaplaning | Curved | 81% #9/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 93% #6/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test | −11.9 | Different tests |
| Dry Braking | Dry | 94% #8/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | 97% #4/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | −3.1 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 98% #6/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −1.6 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 88% #5/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 98% #3/20 · 2024 AutoBild Summer Tyre Test | −9.5 | Different tests |
| Fuel Consumption | Fuel | 95% #40/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 100% #1/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −5.2 | Different tests |
| Abrasion | Other | 73% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 72% #6/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +0.7 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 100% #1/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 97% #7/7 · 2025 Al Volante Summer Tyre Test | +3.2 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 67% #6/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 62% #7/12 · 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested | +5.6 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 74% #10/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 90% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −15.1 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 62% #11/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 79% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −17.5 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 8% #12/52 · 2025 Summer Tyre Test Shootout | 9% #11/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | −0.8 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 96% #12/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #5/14 · 2025 Summer and All Season Combined Tyre Test | −1.8 | Different tests |
| Subj. Comfort | Subj | 50% #7/10 · 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | −45.1 | Different tests |
| Subj. Dry Handling | Subj | 96% #3/10 · 2021 Motor Summer Tyre Test | 95% #4/7 · 2025 Die ReifenTester Summer Touring Tyre Test | +0.7 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #9/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 0.0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 88% #19/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test | 98% #2/8 · 2025 Moottori Summer Tyre Test | −10.0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking - Concrete | Wet | 90% #21/50 · 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | 77% #15/16 · 2026 ADAC Summer Tyre Test | +12.8 | Different tests |
| Wet Circle | Wet | 87% #20/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 98% #4/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −10.5 | Same test |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 92% #17/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | 99% #2/21 · 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test | −7.1 | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A S Fit EQ+
Pros
- Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
- Strong dry and wet road grip with stable handling
- Good fuel economy and low rolling resistance
Cons
- Increased road noise reported by some users
- Stiffer ride quality or firmness in colder conditions (below 10°C)
- Concerns regarding sidewall stiffness and occasional manufacturing flaws (e.g., a hump in one tire)
Tire B Ventus Prime 4
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
- Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
- Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
- Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
- Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
The Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is generally praised as a high-performing and cost-effective touring tire, frequently compared favorably against premium brands like Michelin. Users appreciate its solid dry and wet grip, making it a reliable upgrade over stock or budget tires, though long-term mileage projections in official tests show some conflicting estimates.
r/TyreReviews
·4 upvotes ·2024-03-19
“Are there any Hankook Ventus Prime 4 longevity reviews (perhaps personal experience?) The only info I was able to find is Autobild 2022 and 2024, and ADAC 2024 reviews. In the first one they expect 39k km, in the second 26k and in ADAC - 50k. I'm not sure what to believe. I'm a fairly moderate user and will be replacing stock Primacy 3s which lasted around 45k km. I would like to have something that will last around 4-5 years, which at my current usage would be around 30-35k km. If they consistently fall short of it I would probably pay a premium for a more expensive brand, but reviews give very different figures. If ADAC figures is to be trusted I would surely get them, because I would probably replace the car before I have to put on new tires. But 26k km in the latest Autobild review falls short of my expectations a bit. Are those figures typically less than real life due to more extensive testing and usage? I'm driving a compact SUV with 50/50 city highway driving and no sporty aspirations, very default usage scenario. I could pay more and get goodyear efficientgrip performance 2, but at their longevity they will probably need to be replaced out of age before I wear them down realistically, so that's why I was initially settling in more midrange priced Hankook offering. Would love any help, and appreciate the help I received in my previous post! Read more”
r/CartalkHungary
·2 upvotes ·2024-09-20
“Becsapós ez, nagyon kevés csapadék volt a nyáron, és nagyon könnyű megszokni a száraz tapadást. Aztan meglepődik az ember az esőben. Nekem is volt ilyen gumi az autón, előtte meg az volt rajta amivel vettem (valami noname), hát a Hankook egy nagyságrenddel jobb volt annál. Most VP4 van rajta, es rendben van az is szerintem.”
r/CartalkHungary
·2 upvotes ·2024-09-20
“Az enyémen Ventus Prime4 van, 23 májusi dottal, 23 május végén véve. Két nyár és 20.000km alatt sosem tapasztaltam hogy picit is gond lenne vele, pedig voltam bőven esőben vele. Az esp nekem akkor villogott nagyon mikor eltört a rugó, de az is inkább kanyarban, nem kigyorsításnál. Lengéscsillapítók rendben vannak?”
Top themes
#wet and dry grip#touring tyre category#michelin comparison#price to performance ratio#longevity and mileage#ev compatibility symbol
Based on 15 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Laufenn S Fit EQ+ | B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
72
/ 100
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
75
/ 100
Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better treadwear, comfort and wet. Pick the Laufenn S Fit EQ+ if noise and handling matter most to you.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 57 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 64 on noise.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 82 vs 74 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 71 vs 65 on comfort.
Tire A · Laufenn S Fit EQ+
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.