Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Kumho Solus TA11 vs Michelin Defender T+H — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Kumho

Kumho Solus TA11

Premium Touring All Season tire

Kumho Solus TA11 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
90/100
58 owner reviews
Dry
92
Wet
90
Snow
80
Comfort
92
Noise
90
Treadwear
89
Handling
–

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Michelin

Michelin Defender T+H

Premium Touring All Season tire

Michelin Defender T+H tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
82/100
Owner ratings
Dry
94
Wet
91
Snow
76
Comfort
89
Noise
87
Treadwear
90
Handling
92

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictToo close to call: Kumho Solus TA11 and Michelin Defender T+H are within 2 points overall. Kumho Solus TA11 is stronger on snow, comfort and noise.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Defender T+H leads by 2
A — Kumho Solus TA11
92
B — Michelin Defender T+H
94
Why this score
SourceSolus TA11Defender T+H
Tire Rack owners 88 92
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Defender T+H leads by 1
A — Kumho Solus TA11
90
B — Michelin Defender T+H
91
Why this score
SourceSolus TA11Defender T+H
Tire Rack owners 84 88
SimpleTire owners 91 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus TA11 leads by 4
A — Kumho Solus TA11
80
B — Michelin Defender T+H
76
Why this score
SourceSolus TA11Defender T+H
Tire Rack owners 71 73
SimpleTire owners 80 –

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus TA11 leads by 3
A — Kumho Solus TA11
92
B — Michelin Defender T+H
89
Why this score
SourceSolus TA11Defender T+H
Tire Rack owners 83 88
SimpleTire owners 93 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Solus TA11 leads by 3
A — Kumho Solus TA11
90
B — Michelin Defender T+H
87
Why this score
SourceSolus TA11Defender T+H
SimpleTire owners 90 –

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Defender T+H leads by 1
A — Kumho Solus TA11
89
B — Michelin Defender T+H
90
Why this score
SourceSolus TA11Defender T+H
Tire Rack owners 83 88
SimpleTire owners 90 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Kumho Solus TA11
–
B — Michelin Defender T+H
92

Scores at a glance

Kumho Solus TA11 vs Michelin Defender T+H: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryKumho Solus TA11Michelin Defender T+H
Relative Score 89 88
Dry 92 94
Wet 90 91
Snow 80 76
Comfort 92 89
Noise 90 87
Treadwear 89 90
Handling – 92

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Kumho Solus TA11

The Kumho Solus TA11 is widely regarded as a high-value, budget-friendly touring tire that excels in daily commuting and highway driving. While most users praise its comfort, quiet ride, and longevity, a minority of drivers report concerns regarding performance during aggressive maneuvers or in deep snow conditions.

Pros

  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Reliable tread life and durability
  • Consistent traction in wet and dry daily driving conditions

Cons

  • Lack of rigidity for aggressive or performance-oriented driving
  • Inconsistent performance in deep snow or winter conditions
  • Occasional reports of road noise if not balanced correctly
  • Limited feedback and 'sloppy' handling feel for spirited drivers

Observations

  • Users with minivans and sedans (e.g., Honda Odyssey, Toyota Camry) report high satisfaction with comfort and longevity.
  • Drivers of heavier or more performance-oriented vehicles (e.g., Ford Mustang) note that the tire lacks the sidewall stiffness required for spirited handling.
  • SUV owners note that while the tire is excellent for on-road comfort, it is not suitable for off-road or aggressive terrain use.
Tire B Michelin Defender T+H

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Kumho Solus TA11 B · Michelin Defender T+H
CategoryPremium Touring All Season tirePremium Touring All Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Sizes available18—
Rim diameters13″ – 18″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG700 A B—
Treadwear warranty75,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure44 psi—
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Kumho

Michelin

Too close to call: Kumho Solus TA11 and Michelin Defender T+H are within 2 points overall. Kumho Solus TA11 is stronger on snow, comfort and noise.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Kumho Solus TA11 scores 80 vs 76 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Kumho Solus TA11 scores 92 vs 89 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Kumho Solus TA11 scores 90 vs 87 on noise.

Tire A · Kumho Solus TA11
Tire B · Michelin Defender T+H

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.