81
/ 100
Objective (60%)
88/100
16 professional tests
User signal (40%)
82/100
117 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin CrossClimate+ vs Michelin Energy Saver — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
71
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
76/100
137 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better noise, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 88 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 87 | 83 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) | 99% | 92% |
| Dry Handling (% of best) | 90% | 98% |
Wet
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 9
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 84 | 79 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 71 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) | 87% | 89% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) | 96% | 95% |
Snow
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 23
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 70 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 82 | – |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 78 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 80 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 39
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 76 | 37 |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 1
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 86 | 85 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
CrossClimate+ leads by 2
Why this score
| Source | CrossClimate+ | Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 73 | 71 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin CrossClimate+ | Michelin Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 71 |
| Dry | 88 | 81 |
| Wet | 85 | 76 |
| Snow | 75 | 52 |
| Comfort | 81 | 80 |
| Noise | 76 | 37 |
| Treadwear | 86 | 85 |
| Handling | 73 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
81
/ 100
Tire A
71
/ 100
Tire B
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 99% #2/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 92% #13/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | +7.3 | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 90% #7/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 98% #7/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | -7.9 | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 91% #6/9 · 2020 Tyre Reviews All Season Tyre Test | 88% #3/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | +2.7 | Different tests |
| Noise | Other | 92% #1/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 95% #5/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | -3.7 | Different tests |
| Price | Other | 100% #9/9 · 2021 AZ All Season Tyre Test | 100% #20/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Value | Other | 81% #10/14 · 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 79% #11/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | +1.6 | Different tests |
| Wear | Other | 94% #3/14 · 2020 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 95% #2/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | -1.8 | Different tests |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 11% #9/9 · 2018 ADAC All Season Tyre Test | 7% #15/47 · 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview | +4.4 | Different tests |
| Straight Aqua | Straight | 92% #7/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 95% #8/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | -2.9 | Different tests |
| Total Cost of Ownership | Total | 0% #4/10 · 2018 Auto Bild All Season Tyre Test | 0% #2/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | 0 | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 87% #9/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 89% #17/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | -1.5 | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 96% #4/14 · 2018 New and Worn Summer Tyre Test | 95% #16/20 · 2018 Auto Bild 15 inch Summer Tyre Test | +0.6 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin CrossClimate+ is widely regarded as a benchmark all-season tire, praised for its exceptional versatility and ability to bridge the gap between summer handling and winter safety. While most users report high levels of confidence in wet, dry, and snowy conditions, a minority of users note a decline in performance as the tread wears down or express dissatisfaction with noise levels and ride harshness on specific vehicle setups.
Pros
- Excellent traction and confidence in light to moderate snow and ice.
- Strong wet and dry road handling that rivals dedicated summer tires.
- Impressive tread longevity and durability over high mileage.
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality for the majority of users.
- Consistent performance across a wide range of temperatures.
Cons
- Performance in wet conditions can diminish significantly as the tire wears.
- Increased road noise reported by some users compared to dedicated summer tires.
- Occasional reports of a harsh or 'bouncy' ride on certain vehicle suspensions.
- Higher price point compared to competitors.
- Some users report a 'spongy' or less precise steering feel during aggressive cornering.
Observations
- Users with heavier diesel vehicles or high-torque setups occasionally report faster tread wear and increased road noise.
- Drivers of lighter vehicles (e.g., small hatchbacks) often report improved steering responsiveness and comfort compared to OEM tires.
- Performance on SUVs and 4x4s is frequently cited as a major upgrade over standard summer tires, particularly for winter mountain driving.
The Michelin Energy Saver is widely regarded as a class-leading tire for longevity and fuel efficiency, often exceeding 40,000–60,000 miles for many users. While it excels in dry conditions and provides a comfortable, quiet ride, it receives consistent criticism for a decline in wet-weather performance as the tread wears down and a tendency for the rubber compound to develop sidewall cracking over time.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Reliable dry-weather handling and stability
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip as the tire ages
- Susceptibility to sidewall cracking and dry rot after 3-4 years
- Hard compound can feel 'skating' or insecure in cold or wet conditions
- Lack of road feedback for spirited driving
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or those driving on rough, pothole-prone roads noted that the sidewalls can be fragile and prone to damage.
- Drivers of small hatchbacks (e.g., VW Polo, Ford Fiesta) frequently reported that the tire significantly improved steering lightness and overall handling compared to budget alternatives.
- Owners of high-mileage commuters and taxis consistently praise the tire for its cost-per-mile value, despite the performance drop-off in later years.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin CrossClimate+ | B · Michelin Energy Saver |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
81
/ 100
Michelin
71
/ 100
Michelin
Winner: Michelin CrossClimate+ — better noise, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want a quieter cabin
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 76 vs 37 on noise.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 75 vs 52 on snow.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 85 vs 76 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin CrossClimate+ scores 88 vs 81 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin CrossClimate+
Tire B · Michelin Energy Saver
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin CrossClimate+ also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.