76
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
76/100
137 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin Energy Saver vs Toyo NanoEnergy A29 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Toyo
Toyo NanoEnergy A29
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
40/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Michelin Energy Saver — better treadwear, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 74 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | – |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver leads by 15
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | – |
| Tire Rack owners | – | 61 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | – |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 44 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver leads by 6
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 74 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | – |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 37 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Energy Saver leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | – | 68 |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | – |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | – |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver | Toyo NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 76 | 64 |
| Dry | 81 | 74 |
| Wet | 76 | 61 |
| Snow | 52 | 44 |
| Comfort | 80 | 74 |
| Noise | 37 | – |
| Treadwear | 85 | 68 |
| Handling | 71 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
76
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy Saver is widely regarded as a class-leading tire for longevity and fuel efficiency, often exceeding 40,000–60,000 miles for many users. While it excels in dry conditions and provides a comfortable, quiet ride, it receives consistent criticism for a decline in wet-weather performance as the tread wears down and a tendency for the rubber compound to develop sidewall cracking over time.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Reliable dry-weather handling and stability
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip as the tire ages
- Susceptibility to sidewall cracking and dry rot after 3-4 years
- Hard compound can feel 'skating' or insecure in cold or wet conditions
- Lack of road feedback for spirited driving
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or those driving on rough, pothole-prone roads noted that the sidewalls can be fragile and prone to damage.
- Drivers of small hatchbacks (e.g., VW Polo, Ford Fiesta) frequently reported that the tire significantly improved steering lightness and overall handling compared to budget alternatives.
- Owners of high-mileage commuters and taxis consistently praise the tire for its cost-per-mile value, despite the performance drop-off in later years.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver | B · Toyo NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
76
/ 100
Michelin
64
/ 100
Toyo
Winner: Michelin Energy Saver — better treadwear, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Michelin Energy Saver scores 85 vs 68 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Michelin Energy Saver scores 76 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Michelin Energy Saver scores 52 vs 44 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Michelin Energy Saver scores 81 vs 74 on dry.
Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy A29
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver also compared with
Toyo NanoEnergy A29 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.