82
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
Owner ratings
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated May 2026
Riken Raptor HR vs Toyo NanoEnergy A29 — Compared (May 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
Tire B
Toyo
Toyo NanoEnergy A29
64
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
40/100
No reviews yet
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Riken Raptor HR — better treadwear, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
Raptor HR leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Raptor HR | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 90 | 74 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
Raptor HR leads by 18
Why this score
| Source | Raptor HR | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 84 | 61 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Raptor HR leads by 17
Why this score
| Source | Raptor HR | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 72 | 44 |
Comfort
Score (0–100)
Raptor HR leads by 16
Why this score
| Source | Raptor HR | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | 74 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
Raptor HR leads by 19
Why this score
| Source | Raptor HR | NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Tire Rack owners | 86 | 68 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
Scores at a glance
| Category | Riken Raptor HR | Toyo NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 82 | 64 |
| Dry | 90 | 74 |
| Wet | 79 | 61 |
| Snow | 61 | 44 |
| Comfort | 90 | 74 |
| Noise | 89 | – |
| Treadwear | 87 | 68 |
| Handling | 91 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
82
/ 100
Tire A
64
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Riken Raptor HR | B · Toyo NanoEnergy A29 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Grand Touring All-Season | — |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
82
/ 100
Riken
64
/ 100
Toyo
Winner: Riken Raptor HR — better treadwear, wet and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Riken Raptor HR scores 87 vs 68 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Riken Raptor HR scores 79 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire A
You drive through snowy winters
Riken Raptor HR scores 61 vs 44 on snow.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Riken Raptor HR scores 90 vs 74 on dry.
Tire A · Riken Raptor HR
Tire B · Toyo NanoEnergy A29
More comparisons
Also compared with
Riken Raptor HR also compared with
Toyo NanoEnergy A29 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.