Skip to content
Head-to-head Updated May 2026

Nexen N7000 vs Riken Raptor HR — Compared (May 2026)

Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.

Tire A Nexen

Nexen N7000

All Season High Performance tires

Nexen N7000 tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
55/100
7 owner reviews
Dry
64
Wet
49
Snow
–
Comfort
49
Noise
–
Treadwear
76
Handling
54

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VS
Tire B Riken

Riken Raptor HR

Grand Touring All-Season

Riken Raptor HR tread pattern
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
87/100
Owner ratings
Dry
90
Wet
79
Snow
61
Comfort
90
Noise
89
Treadwear
87
Handling
91

Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.

VerdictWinner: Riken Raptor HR — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.

Category breakdown

7 categories, side by side

Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.

Dry

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Raptor HR leads by 26
A — Nexen N7000
64
B — Riken Raptor HR
90
Why this score
SourceN7000Raptor HR
Tire Rack owners – 90
Tyre Reviews owners 64 –

Wet

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Raptor HR leads by 30
A — Nexen N7000
49
B — Riken Raptor HR
79
Why this score
SourceN7000Raptor HR
Tire Rack owners – 84
Tyre Reviews owners 49 –

Snow

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Nexen N7000
–
B — Riken Raptor HR
61
Why this score
SourceN7000Raptor HR
Tire Rack owners – 72

Comfort

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Raptor HR leads by 41
A — Nexen N7000
49
B — Riken Raptor HR
90
Why this score
SourceN7000Raptor HR
Tire Rack owners – 86
Tyre Reviews owners 49 –

Noise

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100)
A — Nexen N7000
–
B — Riken Raptor HR
89

Treadwear

Weight: Important
Score (0–100) Raptor HR leads by 11
A — Nexen N7000
76
B — Riken Raptor HR
87
Why this score
SourceN7000Raptor HR
Tire Rack owners – 86
Tyre Reviews owners 76 –

Handling

Weight: Neutral
Score (0–100) Raptor HR leads by 37
A — Nexen N7000
54
B — Riken Raptor HR
91
Why this score
SourceN7000Raptor HR
Tyre Reviews owners 54 –

Scores at a glance

Nexen N7000 vs Riken Raptor HR: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryNexen N7000Riken Raptor HR
Relative Score 59 86
Dry 64 90
Wet 49 79
Snow – 61
Comfort 49 90
Noise – 89
Treadwear 76 87
Handling 54 91

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Personalize

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Tire A

Tire B

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

From owners

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Nexen N7000

The Nexen N7000 is generally viewed as a budget-oriented tire that offers acceptable performance for casual, low-demand driving but falls short in safety and refinement compared to premium alternatives. While some users appreciate the value proposition, the consensus highlights significant concerns regarding wet-weather traction, high noise levels, and a rapid decline in performance as the tread wears.

Pros

  • Affordable price point compared to premium brands
  • Adequate dry grip for conservative, non-spirited driving
  • Long tread life reported by some users

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance and safety concerns
  • Excessive road noise, particularly as the tire ages
  • Harsh ride quality, especially on low-profile sizes
  • Sudden loss of traction with minimal warning

Observations

  • Users with 19-inch, low-profile tires reported a notably harsh and unpleasant ride quality.
  • Performance is described as inadequate for turbocharged or high-torque vehicles, with users recommending them only for standard, non-performance daily drivers.
Tire B Riken Raptor HR

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specifications

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Nexen N7000 B · Riken Raptor HR
CategoryAll Season High Performance tiresGrand Touring All-Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Final verdict

Which one should you actually buy?

Nexen

Riken

Winner: Riken Raptor HR — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Riken Raptor HR scores 90 vs 49 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Riken Raptor HR scores 91 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Riken Raptor HR scores 79 vs 49 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Riken Raptor HR scores 90 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Nexen N7000
Tire B · Riken Raptor HR

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.