79
/ 100
Objective (60%)
70/100
1 professional test
User signal (40%)
76/100
137 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
Head-to-head
Updated September 2026
Michelin Energy Saver vs Vredestein T Trac 2 — Compared (September 2026)
Our Relative Score blends 60% objective test data with 40% owner-review signal — so any two tires can be compared even if they were never tested on the same day.
VS
88
/ 100
Objective (60%)
–/100
No test data yet
User signal (40%)
89/100
6 owner reviews
Prices change daily — check the retailer for your size.
VerdictWinner: Vredestein T Trac 2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Read full
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made via links on this page.
Category breakdown
7 categories, side by side
Each bar is the Relative Score for that category. Expand a tile to see the test results and owner ratings behind it.
Dry
Score (0–100)
T Trac 2 leads by 12
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | T Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 83 | 93 |
Wet
Score (0–100)
T Trac 2 leads by 8
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | T Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 79 | – |
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 84 |
Snow
Score (0–100)
Comfort
Score (0–100)
T Trac 2 leads by 7
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | T Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 80 | 87 |
Noise
Score (0–100)
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | T Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | 37 | – |
Treadwear
Score (0–100)
T Trac 2 leads by 5
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | T Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 85 | 90 |
Handling
Score (0–100)
T Trac 2 leads by 14
Why this score
| Source | Energy Saver | T Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Tyre Reviews owners | 71 | 85 |
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Energy Saver | Vredestein T Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 79 | 88 |
| Dry | 81 | 93 |
| Wet | 76 | 84 |
| Snow | 52 | – |
| Comfort | 80 | 87 |
| Noise | 37 | – |
| Treadwear | 85 | 90 |
| Handling | 71 | 85 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Personalize
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
79
/ 100
Tire A
88
/ 100
Tire B
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Test data
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
| Discipline | Category | Tire A | Tire B | Δ | Both? |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Ranking | Overall | 7% #15/47 · 2018 AutoBild Summer Tyre Overview | 20% #5/14 · 2018 ADAC Summer Tyre Test - 175/65 R14 | -13.3 | Different tests |
From owners
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews across retailers and review sites — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
The Michelin Energy Saver is widely regarded as a class-leading tire for longevity and fuel efficiency, often exceeding 40,000–60,000 miles for many users. While it excels in dry conditions and provides a comfortable, quiet ride, it receives consistent criticism for a decline in wet-weather performance as the tread wears down and a tendency for the rubber compound to develop sidewall cracking over time.
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Reliable dry-weather handling and stability
Cons
- Significant loss of wet-weather grip as the tire ages
- Susceptibility to sidewall cracking and dry rot after 3-4 years
- Hard compound can feel 'skating' or insecure in cold or wet conditions
- Lack of road feedback for spirited driving
Observations
- Users with heavier vehicles or those driving on rough, pothole-prone roads noted that the sidewalls can be fragile and prone to damage.
- Drivers of small hatchbacks (e.g., VW Polo, Ford Fiesta) frequently reported that the tire significantly improved steering lightness and overall handling compared to budget alternatives.
- Owners of high-mileage commuters and taxis consistently praise the tire for its cost-per-mile value, despite the performance drop-off in later years.
The Vredestein T-Trac 2 is generally regarded as a competent mid-range tire that balances comfort and durability with respectable dry-weather performance. While users appreciate its ride quality and tread longevity, some note that its wet-weather capabilities fall slightly short of top-tier premium competitors.
Pros
- Excellent ride comfort and bump absorption
- Strong dry-weather grip
- Impressive treadwear longevity
- Good value proposition for a mid-range tire
Cons
- Average wet-weather performance compared to premium brands
- Noticeable road noise on rougher surfaces
- Performance consistency may not match top-tier market leaders
Observations
- Users noted that the tire's treadwear rating (360) compares favorably against common alternatives like Bridgestone and Hankook.
- The tire is perceived as a suitable, balanced choice for daily driving rather than high-performance applications.
Specifications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Energy Saver | B · Vredestein T Trac 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer Premium Touring tires | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Final verdict
Which one should you actually buy?
79
/ 100
Michelin
88
/ 100
Vredestein
Winner: Vredestein T Trac 2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Vredestein T Trac 2 scores 85 vs 71 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Vredestein T Trac 2 scores 93 vs 81 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Vredestein T Trac 2 scores 84 vs 76 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Vredestein T Trac 2 scores 87 vs 80 on comfort.
Tire A · Michelin Energy Saver
Tire B · Vredestein T Trac 2
More comparisons
Also compared with
Michelin Energy Saver also compared with
Vredestein T Trac 2 also compared with
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements) normalized against the best tire in each test and weighted toward recent tests. 40% comes from thousands of owner reviews collected from retailers and review sites. When a tire has only one of the two, we use what exists and say so.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.